The Arrogance of the Supreme Court

Is the United States Supreme Court cavalier about the death penalty? Yes, says The Kansas City Star:

The hooded figure with the sickle was in the U.S. Supreme Court gallery again Wednesday, hovering as justices bickered and joked about him.

After providing an update about cases where people’s lives are on the line, the article concluded this way:

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy asked, “Doesn’t the state have a minimal obligation on its own” to investigate whether its executions cause gratuitous pain?

Later he reprimanded his colleagues for laughing as several justices joked about the mischief that defense lawyers could cause if forced to propose ways to execute their clients.

“This is a death case,” snapped Kennedy, who is expected to be a key vote in the case.

Somehow, this dismissive and jaunty attitude doesn’t surprise me in the least.

Stephen Gordon

I like tasteful cigars, private property, American whiskey, fast cars, hot women, pre-bailout Jeeps, fine dining, worthwhile literature, low taxes, original music, personal privacy and self-defense rights -- but not necessarily in this order.

  1. Back in my Republican days I was all for the death penalty. Now that I know the truth – that at all levels government interest is not in creating justice, only in increasing its own power – I’m not so naive as to believe that that a socialist bureaucracy (if you’ll forgive the redundacy) can appropriately execute those who deserve it. I’ve no problem with capital punishment in theory, but I don’t trust a system where the the DA, the judge and the police gang up on a defendant in order to create prisoners (not justice) via plea bargaining and brain-dead juries.