Britain Follows US Lead on Prostitution

The British government just announced plans to relax laws so that prostitutes could work together in small brothels. From the Times Online:

PROSTITUTES are to be allowed to work together in mini-brothels in an attempt to reduce the risks involved in the sex trade.

In plans announced yesterday, up to three women will be allowed to operate legally from premises as part of a government strategy to tackle prostitution in England and Wales.

The change is intended to provide greater protection for women, but the Home Office admits that it could cause a nuisance in areas where the mini-brothels operate.

A rational mind could take this logic and apply it almost equally to the War on Drug Users. Artist and writer Sebastian Horsley hit the nail squarely on the head:

I have paid for it for many years and I have been paid as a sex worker myself. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with it at all, it’s all about consent. So long as somebody consents to do it then I don’t have a problem with it at all.

He added:

Prostitution is the mirror of man, and man has never been in any serious danger of being bogged down in any kind of grace or beauty. We’re all prostitutes. Some of us sell our souls, some of us sell our minds and some of us sell our bodies. We all expose ourselves and our reputations to careering and whoring and pamphleteering. We’re all selling something, none of us are innocent.

Horsley obviously knows that the United States has led the way in legalizing prostitution. As opposed to the proposed brothels of up to three women in England and Wales, we already have one brothel of 100 and one of 435 whores. On second thought, I’d like to apologize to the women (and men) who honestly exchange sex for money by comparing them to American politicians.

Stephen Gordon

I like tasteful cigars, private property, American whiskey, fast cars, hot women, pre-bailout Jeeps, fine dining, worthwhile literature, low taxes, original music, personal privacy and self-defense rights -- but not necessarily in this order.

  1. Hey, me too, Timothy. I just about lost that gig when I clicked on Atantricchic’s link, though. My curiousity grabbed hold of me, and I started scrolling down. A half second later my boss walked into the office. Luckily, I managed to close out the window before he saw anything, but it would’ve been nice to have had a “Not Safe For Work” notice or something of the sorts. I guess I should’ve known by the name of the link. Well, I should probably get back to selling my time to the Man. Not that I didn’t get paid for writing this!

  2. Daunt – normally we’d remove such a link as spam, but considering the context, it seems somewhat approriate.