More Enron Tapes: Corruption is Mere Marketing

Enron tapesThe saga of the Enron tapes continues to unfold in the latest installment of taped employees. In it, they contemplate just how awesome they are at swindling California out of billions of dollars and creating false crisises with which they manipulated prices and energy availability. CBS News reports in “More Enron Tapes, More Gloating”:

“They’re on the ropes today,” says another employee. “I exported like a f——g 400 megs.”

“Wow,” says another employee, “f–k ’em, right!”


“It’s called lies. It’s all how well you can weave these lies together, Shari, alright, so,” an employee is heard saying.

The other employee says, “I feel like I’m being corrupted now.”

The first employee adds, “No, this is marketing,”


More Enron Tapes, More Gloating [CBS News]

see more…

( -)-(- )Comments Off on More Enron Tapes: Corruption is Mere Marketing

RNC Protest Posters

I wanted to share these posters that I found at the No RNC Poster Project. Apparently their aim is on of “facilitating visual resistance against this summer?Äôs Republican National Convention”, held in New York this August. Some of these are damn funny, but for the most part it’s a rehash of the same tired anti-war chants that have been debunked over and over:

I Don't LoveYay RNC

Anyone know of any poster/anti-poster sites dedicated to resisting the Democratic National Convention in Boston?

No RNC Poster Project [via Wooster Collective]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on RNC Protest Posters

G8 Kick-off

G8 protestorWell, the G8 summit in Sea Island, Georgia is officially kicking off right now. In the city of Savannah (where I’m from, actually), the ratio of protestors to journalists is around 1:1, while the ratio of security is enough to make any kind of violent protest an utter failure. As such, many of the protestors seem confused and the whole ordeal has taken on a carnival air. Associated Press has an article on the kick-off with “Bush, G-8 Leaders Show Newfound Harmony”. The Guardian Unlimited has a rundown of the familiar G8 questions in “Q&A: G8 summit 2004”:

What are the big issues at this year’s G8?
Iraq and Middle East reform have eclipsed the official economic agenda of the gathering. The summit should get off to an auspicious start, with the UN security council poised to unanimously approve a resolution endorsing the June 30 handover of sovereignty to Iraq’s new government.

I can only imagine that the majority of these protestors are slack stoners (wait, I mean “Anarchists”) who think that throwing insults at police (who don’t want to be there) is going to account for anything. I guess we’ll have to wait until nightfall to see if either side decides to get violent.

More updates as they come in.

Bush, G-8 Leaders Show Newfound Harmony [AP]
Q&A: G8 summit 2004 [Guardian Unlimited]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on G8 Kick-off

October Surprise

October Surprise!I’ve been waiting for this kind of site to come out. Essentially it’s a simple poll site which asks “What tricks will BushCo pull to attempt to win the election in November? Well, he’ll probably try something around or before October. Welcome to October Surprise!” Here’s the current results of the poll:

What Will Happen Before The Election?
41.8% – Osama bin Laden captured!
18.4% – Spectacular terrorist attack on US soil!
15.2% – Vote is threatened by terrorist attacks, vote suspended due to red alert.
8.4% – Diebold Election Systems fixes the vote in battleground states.
7.2% – Escalation in Israel, Iran, or North Korea. US opens a new war front.
4.9% – US pulls out of Iraq in October, leaving the UN in charge.
4.1% – WMD’s found in Iraq!

Total votes: 844

October Surprise (via BoingBoing)

( -)-(- )Comments Off on October Surprise

Taking the Low Road on Geneva Conventions

The Simon has a really interesting editorial on the side-stepping of Geneva Conventions by the Pentagon and how it applies to the War on Terror and Abu Ghraib. There’s even a provision that would render the complaint that terrorists are not covered under Geneva a moot debate. Read it in “The Geneva Convention Question”:

Should any doubt arise as to whether persons, having committed a belligerent act and having fallen into the hands of the enemy, belong to any of the categories enumerated in Article 4, such persons shall enjoy the protection of the present Convention until such time as their status has been determined by a competent tribunal.


Perhaps more importantly, especially with the circulation of the Abu Ghraib photos, if the Bush Administration can legally prove the Geneva Conventions do not apply to terrorists, they avoid the risk of criminal trial under the War Crimes Act. The War Crimes Act is a little-known act passed by Congress in 1996 which prohibits grave breaches of the Geneva Convention, such as “outrages against personal dignity.”

Certainly a refreshing analysis of the scandal.

The Geneva Convention Question [The Simon]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Taking the Low Road on Geneva Conventions

Cover-Up: More Memos on Torture

This whole Abu Ghraib thing just seems to be spiraling out of control as more memos keep finding their way out of the Pentagon and White House. This newest one lays the groundwork for torture as a self-defense measure, and makes me sick with it’s inferred message that the ends justify the means. The Wall Street Journal (free mirror at Infoshop News) reports in “Pentagon Report Set Framework For Use of Torture”:

“The infliction of pain or suffering per se, whether it is physical or mental, is insufficient to amount to torture,” the report advises. Such suffering must be “severe,” the lawyers advise, and they rely on a dictionary definition to suggest it “must be of such a high level of intensity that the pain is difficult for the subject to endure.”

You know these bastards are evil when they’re arguing over the fucking semantics of torture. Also, check out Billmon’s take on the report in “Presidential Powers”:

Now I have to admit: The idea of using the Nuremberg trial as a field guide for committing war crimes and getting away with it has never occurred to me before. But then, I’m not a Bush administration legal appointee. It’s probably worth remembering, though, that the Nuremberg Tribunal wasn’t particularly impressed by the “I was only following orders” routine: 12 defendents hanged, 3 sentenced to life, 4 given long prison sentences, only 3 acquitted. If I were Donald Rumsfeld, I don’t think I’d like those odds.

Pentagon Report Set Framework For Use of Torture [Wall Street Journal]
“Presidential Powers” [Billmon]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Cover-Up: More Memos on Torture

Abu Ghraib: Forced Nudity was Pervasive

Naked IraqisAs early as April 2003, there were hints that something was going on in Iraq that didn’t quite mesh with traditional American POW procedures. Iraqis who had been picked up for looting were being stripped naked, their clothes burned and chased naked through Baghdad by American soldiers. But that was only the first sign in Iraq of a pervasive military doctrine of nudity and taboo in an orchestrated effort to humiliate Iraqis. The New York Times has the details in “Forced Nudity of Iraqi Prisoners Is Seen as a Pervasive Pattern, Not Isolated Incidents”:

“It was not uncommon to see people without clothing,” Capt. Donald J. Reese, the warden of the tier where the worst abuses occurred, told investigators in a sworn statement in January. “I only saw males. I was told the `whole nudity thing’ was an interrogation procedure used by military intelligence, and never thought much of it.”


In late October, Red Cross monitors were so alarmed by the number of nude detainees that they halted their visit and demanded an immediate explanation.

“The military intelligence officer in charge of the interrogation explained that this practice was `part of the process,’ ” the Red Cross wrote in a report in February.

This kind of widespread acceptance is not something that everyday soldiers are thinking up in unison across many units. The picture that is beginning to unfold is one of a Pentagon directive that supports the humiliation of civilians and combatants alike with little regard for due process or justice. This is definitely not the American government anyone should be apologizing for.

Forced Nudity of Iraqi Prisoners Is Seen as a Pervasive Pattern, Not Isolated Incidents [New York Times]

see more…

( -)-(- )1 comment

New Masthead

We’re kickin’ it 1776 style. New background and updated/retrograded masthead. I’m recalling the early American pamphleteers and political news writers. Let me know what you think in the comments.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on New Masthead

Texas GOP: Good Ideas, and Really Stupid Ideas

The Texas GOP on Friday decided to unveil it’s ultra right-wing philosophy. On the financial politics, I agree with them, but the rest is pretty whack. The Houston Chronicle has the full story in “Taxes, gays, abortion targeted by state GOP”:

The Texas Republican Party has long been on record against hot-button social issues such as abortion, homosexuality and gay marriage. But the recent approval of gay marriages in Massachusetts prompted delegates to strengthen their language on that issue.

The new platform not only condemns homosexuality — “the practice of sodomy tears at the fabric of society” — it also advocates felony penalties for anyone issuing a marriage license or performing a marriage ceremony for a same-sex couple.

Kevin Drum of Political Animal also has the leftist interpretation of the ideology in “The Future of the Republican Party?” (hint: every part of it is bad). I’ve decided to run down the list that he provided and add my own analysis and opinion, check it out after the jump.

see more…

( -)-(- )1 comment

Reagan Roundup: Not at all Sugar and Spice

Reagan EarsHere’s a little round-up of the more uh… “liberal” articles on Reagan, depending on if your definition of “liberal” is. Let’s just say “liberal” in this sense means not trying to hump Reagan’s casket for political gain.

  • AlterNet has an article called “Reagan Redux”, which explores Reagan’s rise to power: “Within 20 minutes of his inauguration, Iran freed the hostages that wimpy Jimmy Carter had been unable to rescue. I was 11 years old at the time and impressed but baffled. How had he done it?” Republican magic, derr.
  • Another goodie from AlterNet in “66 (Unflattering) Things About Ronald Reagan”: “… Ed Meese (“You don’t have many suspects who are innocent of a crime”), … ‘The bombing begins in five minutes,’ $640 Pentagon toilet seats, … ‘Facts are stupid things,’ …” Yeah, stupid facts, why you always trying to muscle into my political strategy.
  • Slate has a roundup of the international press’s take on Reagan’s death in “Never a Gray Moment”: “[H]is legacy affected President George W. Bush, who ‘would not have torn Iraq away from the ‘axis of evil’ had it not been for the startling victory of Reagan when he moved against the ‘evil empire’ [the Soviet Union].'”
  • And again with Slate, where Christopher Hitchens pretty much says it like it was in “Not Even a Hedgehog”: “He could have had anyone in the world to dinner, any night of the week, but took most of his meals on a White House TV tray. He had no friends, only cronies. His children didn’t like him all that much.”
  • And to wrap this up, proof that Reagan’s Alzheimer’s is contagious: This Gallup article/poll shows that people love Reagan more now than they did when he was actually the president. Personally, I can’t wait to start loving Bush in the same light.

see more…

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Reagan Roundup: Not at all Sugar and Spice

Ronald Reagan is Dead, Long Live the Republican Party!

William Blaze at American Dynamics reminded me once again just why the hell I link to him. He has an excellent retrospective on Ronald Reagan’s career as president and just how quickly the Republican party is going to anxiously flog his more salient and desirable memories. If you thought the exploitation of 9/11 has been crass, wait until George Bush tries to ride Reagan’s coffin back into the White House. More details in “Reagan”:

Now I don’t particularly think its worth criticizing or attempting to judge the pros and cons of an actor presidency. I see it as an emergent property of our media age. The presidents job is to lead, and in this day and age that means leading via the newsmedia. The president needs to be able to communicate on camera, and no one is better prepared for this role then an actor. One can critique the need for an executive branch, or the necessity of a mass media, but as long as both exist, the president’s job is an actor’s job.

That’s no excuse for Reagan though. Actor’s job or not the presidency comes with power. As leader in the media age Reagan played the role fantastically, but he failed utterly when it came to the power. We might need an actor in the White House, but that actor needs to be aware of what’s going on around him. Be able to make decisions, know when his staff is abusing his position…

The logical conclusion indeed. Reagan was a good president, but the hype of recent days belies a history that had it’s good memories as well as it’s bad.

Reagan [American Dynamics]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Ronald Reagan is Dead, Long Live the Republican Party!

Iraqi judge orders arrest of American aide to Chalabi

ChalabiAn Iraqi judge has ordered that the American consultant Francis Brooke, who tried to stop the recent raid on the politician’s headquarters, be arrested. However, Brooke has fled to… Washington, so it’s doubtful if there will be any extradition. The Telegraph has the full story in “Iraqi judge orders arrest of American aide to Chalabi”:

“He stopped the raid by telling the police they didn’t have the legal power to do it because he was an American and they were Iraqis,” said Judge Zuhair Al-Maliky, of the central criminal court in Baghdad.”


Mr Brooke, who is an evangelical Christian, has worked with Mr Chalabi since 1990 – first as a consultant paid by the CIA and most recently as a consultant for BKSH and Associates, a company run by Charlie Black, a Republican Party veteran.

Good to see that Republican stalwarts had no problem funding this guy’s aides after the CIA dropped his bogus ass.

Iraqi judge orders arrest of American aide to Chalabi [Telegraph]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Iraqi judge orders arrest of American aide to Chalabi

Iraq War: Nominated for 0 Tony Awards

A little website called Words Mean Things has nicely paraphrased the Iraq war and created “The Iraq War: A Play in One Act”:

Right: That hornet’s nest is interfering with my enjoyment of our tree. Let’s poke it and get all those hornets out.

Left: What, are you crazy?

Right: No, it’s a great plan. I have this giant stick and I’m not using it at all. Here goes!

[frenzied poking]

[swarm of hornets emerge, stinging both Right and Left]

Right: Damn you, Left! You didn’t help me poke! This is all your fault.


The Iraq War: A Play in One Act [Words Mean Things]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Iraq War: Nominated for 0 Tony Awards

George Tenet’s Resume

Here’s an advance copy of George Tenet’s resume that has been floating around. Yeah, I know it’s a joke (click for larger version):

George Tenet's Resume

George Tenet’s Resume [A Tiny Revolution] [via This Modern World]

Related Entry:
Tenet Resigning

( -)-(- )Comments Off on George Tenet’s Resume

Visual of Chalabi WMD Connections

Uggabugga posted a flashback to this great chart that explains a lot of the connections between Chalabi, the New York Times and the Bush administration (click flor larger version):

Chalabi Org Chart

Org Chart [uggabugga]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Visual of Chalabi WMD Connections

Abu Ghraib Protest Leads to Felony Charges

Call it hyper-vigilance gone totally wrong. 21-year-old Joe Previtera stood on a milk crate and reënacted the infamous scene from Abu Ghraib of the prisoner forced to balance on a box with electrical wires attached to his hands and genitals. The result of this protest in front of a military recruiting office in Boston? a misdemeanor charge and two felony charges: “false report of location of explosives” and a “hoax device.” The Boston Phoenix has the story in “Recruitment-Office Protest.”

A follow-up by the Boston HeraldWired war protester gets break — says that “prosecutors are considering ‘amending’ bomb-threat charges” against Previtera.

Abu Ghraib protestor

This is total malarky on the part of the district attorney. Any rational judge is going to rule that there was no “intent” on the part of Previtera. At the most, he should uphold the charges of creating a public disturbance, but even that is a stretch for anyone with any common sense. Judge the pictures for yourself and you will see that he was not intending to do anything other than play-act the part of the Abu Ghraib prisoner.

Recruitment-Office Protest. [Boston Phoenix]
Wired war protester gets break [Boston Herald]

see more…

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Abu Ghraib Protest Leads to Felony Charges

Chalabi, You Sneaky Bastard

Chalabi is now accusing George Tenet of being “behind the charges against me that claimed that I gave intelligence information to Iran.” Note the timing. Chalabi is in high damage control mode and he’s trying to put himself as the victim of the CIA, when in fact the CIA distanced itself from him in the mid 1990s because he gave them a load of crap intelligence. USA Today has the full report in “Chalabi accuses George Tenet of being behind allegations against him”:

Chalabi, a longtime favorite of the Pentagon, is at the center of a controversy over whether he then shared with Iranian officials the closely guarded information about methods used by the United States to spy on the Iranian regime.


Chalabi also accused Tenet of providing “erroneous information about weapons of mass destruction to President Bush, which caused the government much embarrassment at the United Nations and his own country.”

Chalabi, you’ve spun your way out of a lot of screwed up things in your past: the Jordan bank scam in the 1980s, Iraq intelligence forgeries and false defector reports of WMDs as recently as 2002 and a plethora of other illegalities. The fact is, the man is lying his ass off right now in order to save his own. I think it’s time we turned the heat up on him and exposed himfor the huckster and opportunist scamster that he is

Chalabi accuses George Tenet of being behind allegations against him [USA Today]

see more…

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Chalabi, You Sneaky Bastard

Chalabi Scandal Unfolds

Ahmad Chalabi seems to be a major pain in the ass for the administration right now. Here’s a quick rundown of what’s unfolding in the fallout from the U.S. cozying up to this megalomaniac.

Employees at the Pentagon are undergoing polygraph tests to determine who gave the Iraqi National Congress (I.N.C) state secrets about Iran. The New York Times has that piece in “Polygraph Testing Starts at Pentagon in Chalabi Inquiry”:

The F.B.I. is looking at officials who both knew of the code-breaking operation and had dealings with Mr. Chalabi, either in Washington or Baghdad, the government officials said. Information about code-breaking work is considered among the most confidential material in the government and is handled under tight security and with very limited access.


In the 1990’s, the Iraqi National Congress was part of a C.I.A. covert action program designed to undermine Saddam Hussein’s rule. But Mr. Chalabi had a falling out with the C.I.A., and agency officials concluded that he was untrustworthy. He subsequently forged an alliance with major conservative Republicans in Washington. When President Bush took office, Mr. Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress were embraced by senior policy makers at the Pentagon, which became his main point of contact in the American government.

Billmon isn’t buying the neocon line from Perle and others. He thinks that this is a major screw-up on the part of the Bush administration and the results are finally coming home to bite them in the ass. The Whiskey Bar has more in “The New Pumpkin Papers”:

For the past week, watching the neocons (the ones outside the administration anyway) rally to Chalabi’s cause, I’ve been wondering if our crooked Iraqi will eventually prove to be the right’s version of Alger Hiss, the high-ranking State Department official who was exposed as a Soviet spy – or at least, convicted of perjury for denying he was a Soviet spy under oath.

The Hiss case was an enormous cause celebre in the opening years of the Cold War. The anti-anti-communist left adopted him as a symbol of political persecution and slander – much as the neocons have now done with Chalabi. To the right, Hiss was also a symbol – of everything they detested about the New Deal and the “eastern liberal elite.” He was also a useful tool for pinning the loss of Eastern Europe on the Democrats. Hiss had advised FDR at the infamous Yalta conference, where the map of Europe had been divided among the victorious allies. Treason!

Bush Chalabi

And then a stupid maneuver on the part of the administration to distance itself from Chalabi is failing horribly. He even has photographic proof. Check out “Flopped” by Atrios:

Before: “I sat down with Mr. Pachachi and Chalabi and al-Hakim, people from different parts of the country that have made the firm commitment”

After: “My meetings with him were very brief. I mean, I think I met with him at the State of the Union and just kind of working through the rope line, and he might have come with a group of leaders. But I haven’t had any extensive conversations with him. “

Polygraph Testing Starts at Pentagon in Chalabi Inquiry [New York Times]
The New Pumpkin Papers [Billmon]
Flopped [Atrios]

see more…

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Chalabi Scandal Unfolds

Plame Leak Scandal: Bush Lawyers Up

Plame WilsonBush has decided to seek counsel in the ongoing Valerie Plame/CIA leak investigation. For anyone not familiar, someone in the Whitehouse told a bunch of reporters in June 2003 that she was a CIA operative as retribution against her husband, Joseph Wilson, who had been critical of the Nigerian uraniam claims. CBS News has the full scoop in “Bush, Lawyer Huddle On CIA Leak”:

“In terms of whether or not I need advice from counsel, this is a criminal matter, it’s a serious matter,” the president said. “I have met with an attorney to determine whether or not I need his advice, and if I deem I need his advice, I’ll probably hire him.”


Mr. Bush has repeatedly stated that he has no tolerance for such leaks, but he has expressed doubts the investigation will find ever find answers.

“I have no idea if we’ll find out who the leaker is ?Ķ partially because your industry is good at protecting the leaker,” he said in the past, referring to the media.

Interesting timing on this one. In fact I’m curious to know if this transpired because George Tenet told Bush he was going to resign. Is Tenet planning on turning against the administration and personally fingering George Bush?

Then again, it could have something to do with witnesses recently telling a federal grand jury that Bush did indeed know about the leak and did nothing to prevent it. Capitol Hill Blue has the details on this twist in “Bush Knew About Leak of CIA Operative’s Name”:

Witnesses told a federal grand jury President George W. Bush knew about, and took no action to stop, the release of a covert CIA operative’s name to a journalist in an attempt to discredit her husband, a critic of administration policy in Iraq.


Sources within the investigation say evidence points to Rove approving release of the leak. They add that their investigation suggests the President knew about Rove’s actions but took no action to stop release of Plame’s name.

Perhaps Bush knows that he may be indicted in a federal crime.

There’s more… I caught this post by American Dynamics just as I was wrapping this up. Mr. Blaze Thickeye (Wm Blaze is off camping) is also raising an eyebrow over the timing of the Tenet resignation and Bush getting a lawyer, but he’s thinking the reverse: “a major figure has resigned his post, totally knocking the lawyer story out of the news cycle”. More analysis on the subject in the post “gods n monsters (aka three posts in one)”.

Bush, Lawyer Huddle On CIA Leak [CBS News]
Bush Knew About Leak of CIA Operative’s Name [Capitol Hill Blue]
gods n monsters (aka three posts in one) [American Dynamics]

see more…

( -)-(- )1 comment

Abu Ghraib: Suing for Info

Civil-rights and veterans groups have filed a complaint against the U.S. for information on the abuses at Abu Ghraib and other foreign military prisons where abuse may have occured. The groups — The American Civil Liberties Union, The Center For Constitutional Rights, Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense and Veterans for Peace — claim that U.S. departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State (the CIA and FBI are also named) have failed to comply with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the groups last year. Reuters has the details in “U.S. is sued over records of military prisoner abuse”:

They said that the only information that has been released since their FOIA request was a set of guidelines that State Department employees are to use when answering questions from reporters about the treatment of detainees. An ACLU lawyers said the guidelines emphasized that prisoners were being treated humanely.

The groups are asking the court to order the immediate release of records about the abuse of prisoners held at Abu Ghraib and other overseas detention facilities, the deaths of detainees in United States custody and the policies governing the interrogation of detainees in United States custody.


“The administration’s refusal to release these records in light of all we now know about rampant abuses at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and elsewhere is simply outrageous,” said Jeffrey Fogel, director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “The American public has a right to know what was condoned, by whom, and how far up the chain of command it went.”

I doubt that any Federal judge is going to have much sympathy for agencies that appear to be trying to cover information up, but I also doubt that Powell and the State Dept are complicit in any of this. Remember that he handed in his resignation (pre-resignation, he won’t be returning in 2005 if Bush does) very close to the time that memos were being passed around that warned of war crimes, presidential culpability and the obsolecence of Geneva Conventions.

U.S. is sued over records of military prisoner abuse [Reuters]

see more…

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Abu Ghraib: Suing for Info

Tenet Resigning

Tenet ResignsOne line item right now, I’ll post an update as more details emerge. Reuters has a placeholder at “CIA Chief Tenet Resigning, Bush Says”:

CIA Director George Tenet is resigning for personal reasons, President Bush said Thursday.

Reuters now has another article with the full details in “Tenet Resigns as Head of CIA”.

Wonkette questions the timing of the announcement — invoking Karl Rove as the possible initiator in “Tenet Resigns: Has Rove Risen Again?” The announcement comes at a time when “all the varsity league White House correspondents are already in Rome”, she goes on to note that it won’t really help deflect attention: “Of course, you don’t always need to rig things so that you’re playing the B team. Sometimes the B team is already playing.”

MSNBC has slightly more information on the events surrounding the resignation as well as a bio in “George Tenet resigns as CIA director”. It also cites that his last day is July 11th.

CIA Chief Tenet Resigning, Bush Says [Reuters]
Tenet Resigns as Head of CIA [Reuters]
Tenet Resigns: Has Rove Risen Again? [Wonkette]
George Tenet resigns as CIA director [MSNBC]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Tenet Resigning

Interview with Wonkette

The Politburo Diktat has an interesting (*cough* satirical *cough*) interview with Wonkette, aptly named “Does This Font Make My Blog Look Fat?”:

KGB: I’m really honored, being just a small blogger and all, that you would spend some time on this.
Wonkette: Book deal!
KGB: Uh … gee thanks, but my blog is just a faux Commie schtick, satirical, mostly about politics and war and news, with an occasional picture of a pretty girl thrown in. It wouldn’t have a large audience.
Wonkette: Book deal!
KGB: I don’t think so.
Wonkette: Do you write a lot about anal sex?
KGB: No.
Wonkette: K-Y Jelly?
KGB: Nope.
Wonkette: Godiva Chocolate balls?
KGB: Godiva Chocolate balls???
Wonkette: Don’t ask. … Look, I could get you fired, and we could take it from there. How does that sound?
KGB: No, no, no. I kinda wanted to interview about your blog, blogging in general, its relationship to established media, and so forth ..
Wonkette: Bush is gay.

Do I sense a backlash against the establishment?

Does This Font Make My Blog Look Fat? [Politburo Diktat]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Interview with Wonkette

On How I Posted Anonymously in Order to Make a Name for Myself

Pardon my language, but nobody seems to be getting this shit-stain story right. Polier came closer than anyone else due to her tenacity, but of course her analysis — The Education of Alexandra Polier — is one of victim retribution upon those who raped her unblemished name. She completely disses on damn near everyone who had anything to do with this story. Going so far as to omit things from my interview with Bob Kolker in order to paint me as an opportunist looking to make a name for myself. Let me qoute the article and see if you can figure out what’s wrong with this:

…an obscure political Website called ran a commentary by someone calling himself Son of Liberty … VanDyke says now that he was merely trying to make a name for himself by posting the rumor.

Know what? I didn’t fucking say I was trying to make a name for myself. How the fuck could I have been? I was using a pseudonym in order to be able to post things that might have inflamed people. It got to the point where I was getting death threats from Kerry supporters. Then you have the conspiracy retards who thought that “Son of Liberty” was actually Cam Barrett. Well guess what?

Even Cam Barrett himself fucking gets it wrong, and he is the owner of WatchBlog, where I initially broke this god-forsaken story. Here’s what Cam had to say about me in a recent post — Political Rumors — on his website:

It is complete coincidence that the story was broken on WatchBlog by an anonymous editor who wanted to make a name for himself.

I mean, it had to be true right? I was posting anonymously in order to make a name for myself.

Wait a fucking minute… is anyone reading the same damn qoutes as me? How are these people drawing a parallel between posting anonymously or using a pseudonym and trying to make a name for myself? I don’t get it.

Now, this probably leads to the ultimate question, which is: “Why did you expose yourself for the article?” Good question, and I’ll tell you the same reason that I told Bob Kolker in our phone interview: I wanted to clear Cam Barrett’s name from any of the conspiracies that had surfaced.

Is Cam thankful? Is any of this even reported accurately now that I’m on the receiving end of misinformation? Apparently not, but I guess that’s the irony of getting involved in this journalistic abortion tripe in the first place. That’s why I stick to truth and facts now and could care the fuck less about rumors. But hey, maybe I’m just “making a name for myself”.

The gall of these people, I swear.

The Education of Alexandra Polier [NY Metro]
Political Rumors [Camworld]
Related Entry: Alexandra Polier: “How I Got Smeared?”

( -)-(- )Comments Off on On How I Posted Anonymously in Order to Make a Name for Myself