It’s here. The 4th anniversary of the largest “terrorist” attack that this country has ever faced. To me, it’s plainly obvious that 9/11 was not just planes flying into buildings. It is after no less than 80-100 hours of personal research, using all resources available (both original and compilations from other researchers), that I know and believe that 9/11 was a controlled demolition. I do not make such a claim lightly, and I’m willing to stake my reputation on it.
To those of you who dismiss this right from the get-go with statements like “oh come on, why would the government do that.” or “You’re a dumb ass.” I ask you one question. Who befitted the most from 9/11 – Bush or Al Qaeda?
Did Al Qaeda pass the USA PATRIOT ACT? Nope. But Bush certainly pushed it through with no opposition shortly after.
Did Al Qaeda get to invade Afghanistan and Iraq against minimum opposition while playing the 9/11 card? Nope, that would be Bush.
Does Al Qaeda get to endlessly repeat “remember 9/11” as a pretext for every loss of our civil liberties which further empowers the federal government? Hahaha, nope. Bush wins again!
Does Al Qaeda immediately get big boasts in the defense spending budgets to hand out to political friends and allies? Nope, but damn, those weapon sales sure help boast their bottom line don’t they!
I don’t know if you’re keeping track here, but I think Al Qaeda has a big fat 0 on the scoreboard.
I’m also not alone in my beliefs. It’s almost silly to call it a belief when I have no question in my mind, but I’ll leave it at that. I’m joined by many others in this country that know the government was involved. Experts like Kevin Ryan and Eric Hufschmid have proven, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the physics of how the towers collapsed is not possible (particularly building 7, which was hit by no plane and had a tiny fire on one of the bottom floors). Former Bush administration member Morgan Reynolds came out and refuted the official story point by point. Well respected theologian David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor and 9/11 Commission Report. Admissions and Distortions, has given countless speeches across the country arguing that 9/11 was not just the towers falling down. It’s been used as a pretext by the administration for building and expanding the American empire. Even survivors like William Rodriquez has been interviewed countless times regarding his testimony of explosions in the WTC basement that occurred shortly after the planes hit one of the towers.
This is not something I heard from a hippie on the street folks. This is not something I heard from the man with the tin foiled hat. This is serious. This is real.
I offer you one last thought to ponder before I list the questions. After seeing the Katrina/FEMA debacle, is it that hard to imagine that the powers that be really don’t care about the lives of the citizens in this country?
Without further ado, the questions (most courtesy of whatreallyhappened.com) that have not been addressed by the likes of CNN, FOX, NY Times, Times Magazine, or any other mainstream media source.
How is it possible that at least 6 of the hijackers were still alive days after the attacks?
Is it pure coincidence that FEMA was in New York on September 10? Why did they deny this fact?
Where were the 800Ã‚Â°C infernos in the buildings?
Why didn’t firefighters in the impact area of WTC 2 report a blazing inferno or failing trusses before the building’s collapse? Folks, these firefighters were AT THE IMPACT CENTER. The transcripts show this. They reported 2 pockets of fire. And they took down the buildings?
Why did firefighters report bombs in the WTC buildings? Why did firefighters report explosions before the collapses?
Larry Silverstein said of WTC 7 “the smartest thing to do is pull it” (i.e. demolish it), and all evidence points to this occurring. When and why were demolition charges placed in the building?
How could conventional fires produce temperatures in excess of 700Ã‚Â°C in the WTC wreckage?
How could conventional fires in the WTC wreckage burn for three months?
How come one of the towers was able to withstand a 3 hour 6 floor fire and not collapse?
How could 3 World Trade Center towers collapse from fire, when fire has never destroyed a steel frame building before or after the alleged fire collapses on 9/11?
I realize the questions can be unbelievably painful, but they have to be asked. You cannot bury your head in the sand. Despite what the politicians want you to believe, it’s not unpatriotic to question your government. In fact, in doing so, you keep them in check and make it harder for the power of government to grow beyond it’s intended purpose. I think we can all agree that the government is becoming to large and powerful. That things like our constitutionally protected rights are merely “inconvenient” to them.
You want small government? Show the people that they’ve been lied to in regards to 9/11. Show them that the government doesn’t value them. Show them that the power we’ve granted them has become largely abused, and hopefully will see the light.
Spread the word, please. The lies must stop. If you’re ashamed to do what’s right, for fear of being ridiculed as a “conspiracy nut”, then allow me to quote my main man Mark Twain.
“In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man; brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot.”
Update: Apparently this post has struck a nerve with some people. I imagine it has. But I can’t think of another theory besides controlled demolition that can explain how the events of 9/11 happened. If someone can explain to me how Al Qaeda not only flew planes into the buildings, but wired it up as well, I’m all ears.
Update 2: Here’s a very thorough and comprehensive 9/11 research organization. Chock full of pictures and details galore. Enjoy.