Greenspan: Holy Crap, We’re Freagin Doomed!

In a rare moment of honesty, the monetary maestro, Mr. Greenspan himself, declared triumphantly in front of millions that the “US lost deficit control”.

Well, actually that’s not quite the case. If by millions of people, I meant France’s Finance minister and by triumphantly I meant in private away from cameras and reporters, then yes – Greenspan finally said what we all knew. Deficits have been appalling. 2005 is looking to put us 781 billion more in the hole. No worries though, they’ll get the budget balanced next year, they swear!

If I were you, and you’re probably glad you’re not, I would start stocking up on all the essentials (tuna, doritos, beer), because when the FED finally starts admitting that they are up shit creek, they start tightening monetary policy to end the party. But it was fun while it lasted.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Greenspan: Holy Crap, We’re Freagin Doomed!

Bush’s Plea for Cash to Rebuild Iraq Nets $600

You know support is low for your cause when a girl scout bake sale could pull in a larger hunk of cash. Obviously, the administration didn’t really push this, so it’s no surprise few donated. But still. 600 dollars? Sure, that’s enough to have a few fun days in vegas, but it’s certainly not enough to stop ‘insurgents’.

I personally thought it was a stupid plea to begin with (and this has nothing to do with being for or against the war). The spending in Iraq is on the order of 100’s of billions. What sort of cash was Bush expecting the people to donate? Even if it was on the order of millions, that’s still dwarfs the billions of dollars that were somehow got “lost” on the balance sheets.

However, people poured out their hearts and wallets to help for Katrina, Rita, and many other natural disasters in recent years. And it’s not that Americans don’t care about the lives of the Iraqis or any other group of people. It’s just that we’ve seen little to no results from the government’s billions. Throwing more money at the problem is unlikely to solve it (just like the war on drugs, the war on poverty, etc).

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Bush’s Plea for Cash to Rebuild Iraq Nets $600

Your Advice, Please

We hit our first two debates in the Birmingham race I am managing last night. Bodenhausen did fairly well in the first one, and significantly better in the second one. It was mostly an issue of the candidate getting over the jitters and regaining that competitive campaign composure in the first debate. In the second debate, he did well except for one blown answer opportunity — but we have that problem fixed now.

There are six candidates in the race. The incumbent has used eminent domain to bring a new Wal-Mart to town in the very same district in which we are campaigning. We managed to turn a general debate into one primarily about eminent domain.

In debate one, Bodenhausen spoke first, and in his first three minute block he hammered away on eminent domain. Following Bodenhausen was the most conservative of the remaining candidates. Although we have inside information to the contrary, this forced that candidate to join the “Yea, Me Too!” club. The conservative-leaning candidate stated, “I absolutely agree with Bodenhausen on using eminent domain to the benefit of private developement.”

The topic came up a few more times in the first debate. During the second debate, it came up more often, and was used to some degree by all the candidates there to challenge the incumbent’s record. Responding to the applause we drew, even the most liberal of our opposition saw and seized upon the opportunity to torment the incumbent on this issue.

The problem is that the incumbent drew applause, too. She has a great, snappy response to the issue — which we need to overcome. She used it both times to great effect, improving upon it the second time. It goes something like this: “… [same old blah, blah, blah lines about economic development and job creation you’ve certainly heard countless times]. I’m proud of what I have accomplished and stand on my record. Anyway, we only used eminent domain one time, against a bookstore selling pornography.”

Both times she used this line, she drew a lot of applause. She doesn’t have to use her remaining time after that line, and promptly sits down.

To the best of my knowledge, she is technically correct. Most of the businesses that were relocated did so “voluntarily” because they were forced to do so. An article pertaining to this same case provides:

“Chris Curran, owner of Spuds Pub, told the newspaper that the city has put a gun to owners’ heads. “Anybody who has been signing contracts with Wal-Mart is signing under duress,” Curran said. “That means: Here’s our contract, sign it and if you don’t sign it, we’ll take it. … They (city officials) just want a trophy, and they don’t mind pushing us out of the way to have that trophy.”

I don’t normally cross-post blog entries on the various sites where I write, but in this case, I’m going to make an exception. We have another debate in just a few hours, and I’d like to get as many ideas as possible on how to defeat the incumbent’s most effective line. Especially a sound-byte which combines brevity and impact. Ideas?


Busy day…

I’ve been pretty busy lately, and not had much time to rant at HoT. As I just blogged a couple of my recent activities on other sites, I’d thought I’d link them here to catch y’all up with some political activities in Alabama.

The first event on Saturday was a peace rally in Birmingham. I was able to arrange to have Lew Rockwell added to the speaker line up. Lew’s speech is here. There was a fair amount of libertarian participation, good press, and the event went very well. My blog entry at LFS, which includes a lot of neat pictures of hard working activists, is here.

From the speech:

The US believes it can starve foreign countries such as Iraq by imposing killer sanctions that a high US official said were worth the lives of hundreds of thousands of children.

The US believes that it can use its weapons of mass destruction to threaten any country in the world on the very suspicion that it might be trying to defend itself. The US can then phony up intelligence, overthrow a leader, and install a regime of its choosing. Not to worry: its magical military Midas touch will transform that country into a paragon of democratic freedom – just as soon as all political opposition is silenced or destroyed.

In short, the US government believes that it operates under a different moral standard, not only from the moral standard that regular people apply to their own affairs, but even different from the moral standard that the US applies to other states.

And who pays the price for this moral hypocrisy? The victims of war.

Although wearing a sweaty t-shirt, I had another event immediately following the rally. I managed to take a quick shower, slap on some cologne, and put on a suit and drive to the other event in less than an hour. I met Mark “Bo” Bodenhausen along with some of his staffers at the 40th Anniversary Banquet for the Alabama ACLU. National ACLU Executive Director Anthory Romero was the key note speaker, and I managed to snap this shot of Bodenhausen and Romero waiting for the valets to return their vehicles.

Romero gave a good speech. I agreed most of it — especially on voting rights and civil liberties. As he only spewed collectivist swill in my direction a bare few times and made a lot of very valid points, my applause at the end of his talk was actually heartfelt, and not the pertunctory clapping expected at a social event like that.


CNN Rita Coverage: It is Windy and Rainy

CNN\'s Rita team coverage

It takes three on-location reporters to tell you that a hurricane blows wind and rain. At the same time.

They don’t call it team coverage for nothing, folks.

Call me morbid, but the odds of flying debris decapitating one of these guys live just went up threefold (red rover, red rover, send a chunk of fencing right over…. AAAAAAAAAH!).

Guess who had the most informative news. The interviewee at NOAA sitting at his desk in a shirt and tie with a computer behind him. Sensationalism whaaaa….?

Previously: Hurricane Katrina Spares Sensationalist Media


Rita: Don’t You Try and Run Away From Me!

Rita Bus BlastIn one of those “damned if you do, damned if you don’t moments,” 45 elderly evacuees died in a bus explosion. And this wasn’t just any explosion, I mean look at the picture. We’re talking nothing but the frame left.

The weird part is the bus apparently pulled over before “explosions” went off. From the article

The bus, carrying about 45 elderly evacuees, burst into flames on Interstate 45 south of Dallas. It pulled over and people were getting off when a series of explosions ripped through the bus.

Peritz said the fire was believed to have started in the bus’s brake system and may have caused oxygen canisters on the bus to explode.

So let this be a lesson to everyone out there. When fleeing from a Cat-4 hurricane, do not take your oxygen tanks when riding on a greyhound. It’s a rookie mistake.

And no, I’m not giddy from this misfortune. Fate just had their numbers apparently. It was either drowned in Rita or burn in transit. Luckily, the other 1.8 million probably got out OK.

Update: I should also have stated, “don’t you New Orleans residents come back!” There are new breaks and water is already going over the levees again. Guess they’ll have to leave again.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Rita: Don’t You Try and Run Away From Me!

States To Avoid

Now we all know the Lew Rockwell can be dull and boring, but this one article caught my attention – “States to Avoid” by Al Doyle. Basically, it’s a list of 8 states that were voted “most likely to become annexed with China” in the US yearbook.

Obviously, living in Tax-achusetts, I knew what was coming. Still, I hoped that just maybe it didn’t make the list.

The author used only one criteria. Strictness of gun control/confiscation laws. The reason is simple, the more the government fucks you over, the more they want to ensure you won’t be able to fight back. I mean, all the great societies of the 20th century had strict gun laws! That is, before there was some form mass revolt and/or genocide.

I won’t spoil the results (for what’s the fun in that). But I can tell you right now, owning a gun in Massachusetts is next to impossible, so don’t be surprised.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on States To Avoid

Operation Clean Sweep: Kick the Bastards Out

clean sweep pigThe people of Pennsylvania are pissed. And rather than just take it, a group of citizens have formed Operation Clean Sweep. There goal: To get rid of EVERY single incumbent legislator in the next election.

So why the anger? Well, the legislators, in an 11th hour move, decided to give themselves a large pay raise just before leaving office and before anyone could catch them on it. These pay raises were as large as 54 percent.

The response from the lawmakers is downright hysterical. One lawmaker, Angel Cruz, admitted the following in front of reporters when questioned:

Cruz: (Regarding the Pennsylvania Constitution) “I’ve never read it. I’d be lying to you if I said I’d read it”

So, you took an oath of office, to “support, obey and defend,” a document you claimed to have never read. Congratulations, you just gave yourself a pay raise.

Fortunately, this is an organization with teeth. They have already got funding, as well as 27 candidates. Support is growing. Perhaps it’s a pipe dream, but these people seem damn ready to go.

The picture is of the 25 foot inflatable pig that sits in front of the legislative building in Harrisburg, PA.

Hat tip to WING TV (link to thursday’s episode) for the interview with the founder of Operation Clean Sweep.


Libertarian Party should endorse PorkBusters

PorkBustersThe blogosphere is ablaze over the somehow recent news that — oh noes — the Republican led government isn’t fiscally conservative by a long shot. There’s this sentiment that the blame rests with Katrina ushering in big government, but come the fuck on. When someone like majority speaker Tom DeLay declares an “ongoing victory,” and says there is simply no fat left to cut in the federal budget — the shit has to hit the fan as the conservative base speaks up.

And they have. Glenn Reynolds and The Truth Laid Bear have teamed up and unveiled PorkBusters, a project to get the congresscritters to cough up all the bacon they brought home and slim down the federal budget. And it’s a great idea, because it’s going to bitchslap the bloated government right upside its fat head.

Which is why I’m surprised that once again, the Libertarian Party is silent. Hell, there should be a gigantic splash image right next to pledge image endorsing PorkBusters. Show some balls and jump feet first into the biggest conservative backlash against Republicans and ride the wave into 2006. Hell, every Libertarian candidate should endorse PorkBusters too, but that’s getting ahead of ourselves.

Come on Libertarian Party, do it.

Just fucking do it.

(They’re not going to do it, are they?)

Update: I would be remiss not to mention the Republican’s attempt to reel the budget in with their “Operation Offset” (because a war on accountants deserves a cool name, you dig?). With a deft knife, it appears they are ready to thinly slice the fat from the top ($5.2 billion in reduced corporate welfare) and work hard to get to those tendons holding the meat to the bone. Total FY2006 savings: $139 billion.

I await a smart juxtaposition of this document with any of the taxpayer pork groups’ proposals.

Another Update: From (a very conservative news outlet) [via Instapundit]:

What happens here is important, not just for recovery efforts in the Gulf, but for the future of conservatism and the relationship of fiscal conservatives with the GOP. If the Republican majority can’t prioritize spending now, there is no reason to believe it ever will.

Uh, earth to national LP… the true conservatives are restless, where are your open arms?


Spreading Democracy, Embracing Hypocrisy

You gotta wonder if the Bush administration thinks people won’t notice it when they do stuff like this:

President Bush decided Wednesday to waive any financial sanctions on Saudi Arabia, Washington’s closest Arab ally in the war on terrorism, for failing to do enough to stop the modern-day slave trade in prostitutes, child sex workers and forced laborers.

In June, the State Department listed 14 countries as failing to adequately address trafficking problems, subjecting them all to possible sanctions if they did not crack down.

You know, if you’re gonna have a ideology of spreading democracy and freedom, it’s pretty damned duplicitous to create different standards of conduct based on how much money money is changed hands by private business.

Entangling alliance indeed.


Rita: Category 12; Almost a Black Hole

Daily ShowThe Daily Show strikes again. But this time, the focus is more on how the administration plans to deal on picking up Katrina’s tab from the Big Easy.

Basically. New Orleans had a one night stand with Katrina that has left this city with a hangover and an empty wallet. Because no one expected a hurricane to hit and damange a below sea level city, New Orleans needs money… badly. How much? As Jon Stewart says:

It’s still unclear how exactly how much will be needed to help the gulf coast recover. But this week’s Newsweek puts the price tag at $200 billion dollars.

Damn. That’s a hefty sum of money. One could take over another country with those funds. So how did Bush say he was going to help pay for it?

Bush: It’s gonna cost whatever it’s gonna cost. Therefore, we should not raise taxes.

Wow. So what is your solution then? Basically, it’s the accumulation equation (for all those fellow geeks out there). In economic terms it is:

Money saved = tax dollars in – money spent + dollars printed

So if you’re not taxing, and you are paying money out, we’re either A) going more in debt or B) printing shit loads of money.

The tour de force of the clip comes from Rob Corddry, who explains this quirk in Bush’s conservative nature.

Rob Corddry: Everything the president is doing is perfect in keeping with the conservative ideal with limited government. This government believes government should be limited not in size, but effectiveness. In terms of effectiveness, this is the most limited administration we’ve ever had…

Jon Stewart: How is his record spending conservative?

Rob: Because it’s paid for by supply economics. It’s a faith based accounting approach.

Big thanks for The Daily Show for helping to show just how “conservative” the neo-cons actually are.


When the Gulf Coast is a Rockin…

hurricane crying game

Furthur proof that god is a comedian. Hurricane Ophelia also had phallic imagery.

( -)-(- )1 comment

Bush/Iraq Approval Rating Drops to 32 Percent

Unless something changes drastically in the near future, public pressure may force the administration to actually create a timeline (you know, one of those things that says you’ll do A and B by dates C and D) for leaving Iraq.

The data for the approval versus time for the CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll is here. Now fortunately we don’t live in a democracy (we have a Republic), so merely tipping the scales to past 51 percent in support of or against something does not give a leader carte blanche to do whatever it is they want to do. However, this administration used numbers and polls as their justification that the american people supported this war. Now that the numbers are totally the other way around, we hear nothing. I’m not shocked by this, as it’s merely a marketing technique. It’s an argumentum ad populum or “appeal to the majority” to convince everyone that you’re right simply because everyone thinks you’re right.

My question is, how low will the numbers go? 30? 25? 20? Just imagine if only 20 percent approved of the war. In this divided left versus right political spectrum that we always here about, there are hardly ANY issues that have become that lopsided.

I’m curious to see how this plays out and which way the numbers will go from here. The republicans are surely getting upset as well… perhaps libertarians can use this as an advantage and give these people a better alternative. I’m sure they are getting sick of the non-converative neo-cons.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Bush/Iraq Approval Rating Drops to 32 Percent

Daily Show: FEMA Preparations for Hurricane Rita

The Daily Show - Rita\'s DigestFresh off the heels of Katrina, The Daily Show gets jiggy with Hurricane Rita (WMP video). Jon Stewart jogs right around the curve should another disaster hurricane hit the U.S. and predicts just how FEMA and the White House will respond to this category 2 hurricane:

Jon Stewart: At the very least, is the government better prepared to deal with Rita than perhaps we were with Katrina?

Rob Corddry: Yes, absolutely Jon. Whatever their shortcomings in the past, the federal government has learned the lesson of Katrina: start blaming state and local officials now. [laughter] I’ve already been assured by FEMA that the mayor and governor… will have failed. And this time, the president will not be detached. There are already plans to helicopter him in to save a baby trapped in raging floodwaters. [laughter]

Jon: That seems to be taking a bit of a chance, no?

Rob: No… no they got five babies spread out, around… [laughter] …the area. Jon, they’re confident Bush will get one. [laughter[

Jon: Who would give… who would give their baby to be used in that type of fashion?

Rob: You’d be surprised Jon, the GOP has a classification for that level of donor… [laughter] …uh, I believe it’s called the Ranger Elite… [laughter] …there are people who have donated $250,000… and of course, a baby.

More info on Hurricane Rita:

Update by Rick Rajter: Rita has moved up to a Category 4 hurricane. Hopefully it’ll die down a bit before hitting a coastline.

Update Again by Rick Rajter: Well fuck. We’re at Category 5 now. Yippee.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Daily Show: FEMA Preparations for Hurricane Rita

FEMA: Awesome at this Geography Stuff

We’re not sure we get the punchline to this joke (via Hit & Run):

Q: What do you do when you have nearly 200 trucks of ice for hurricane victims on the Gulf coast?

A: Send them to Maine.

Now, not to jump to conclusions, but smart money says someone at FEMA is gonna be eating lobster and clam chowder this weekend.


The Baby – Al Qaeda Connection

It’s a sad day when a family has to miss a flight simply because their 2 year old kid appears on the no-fly list.

I can’t imagine the conversation being something like this.

Airport TSA employee: Excuse me ma’am, but our database shows that little Johnny here is on the no-fly list. Apparently, he’s been involved with money laundering since 9 months old.

Johnny’s Mom: Oh no! But we’re going to miss our flight to [insert some dumb amusement park in another state]. We got to get on!

TSA: I’m sorry ma’am. But we have to search him for weapons. Can you please remove his diaper.

Personally, the only “bomb” I think they would discover would be a result of too much broccoli. While it would certainly be upsetting, it’s hardly worth making the family miss the flight. Why aren’t TSA employees reasonable enough to realize that the baby isn’t going to hijack the plane? And why does the no-fly contain 100,000+ names? Are we to believe their are 100,000 terrorists in the country? Jeez, why bother then. Or are people just being randomly placed on it? Seems to defeat the purpose of the list if so many people are on it.


Political Analyst: “The US Government Did Not Fail Its Mission in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina”

G Edward GriffinI’ll admit, I was a little shocked at the title too. But this isn’t from some two bit ranting lunatic on local access news, this was an article written by G. Edward Griffin. His most famous piece of work is his book The Creature from Jekyll Island, which blew the cover off the hidden secrecy behind the corrupt Federal Reserve formed in 1913.

So this guy has credentials up the wazoo. His article paints a very different picture of the FEMA/Katrina debacle.

Griffin’s main point is that FEMA and Homeland security were not in fact designed to protect the citizens! From the article:

The primary job of the military, FEMA, and Homeland Security is not to protect the American people in times of emergency but to protect the government in times of emergency and keep it functioning. Their primary assignment is, not to rescue people, but to control them. Their directive is to relocate families and businesses, confiscate property, commandeer goods, direct labor and services, and establish martial law. The reason FEMA and Homeland security failed to carry out an effective rescue operation is that this was not their primary mission, and the reason they blocked others from doing so is that any operations not controlled by the central authority are contrary to their directives. Their objective was to bring the entire area under the control of the federal government – and this they succeeded in doing very well. They did not fail in New Orleans. They were a huge success. Once this simple fact is understood, everything that happened in the wake of Katrina becomes understandable and logical.

Pretty heavy shit if you ask me. But it would certainly explain all of FEMA’s apparent attempts at foiling rescue efforts. His article lists all the mainstream articles showing how FEMA deliberately blocked aid efforts.

It’s hard to dismiss his arguments, because there seems to be no evidence to the contrary. Even their about us section doesn’t really make it clear that they are meant to save lives versus political damage control.


FBI Promises (Hot Agent-on-Agent) War on Porn

Dubya backdoor warYou gotta love it when two seemingly divergent stories provide such a shining example of why our federal government sucks.

First, the (mixed) bad news, the FBI is recruiting for a porn squad (remember how we won those war on poverty, drugs and terror?):

Early last month, the bureau’s Washington Field Office began recruiting for a new anti-obscenity squad. Attached to the job posting was a July 29 Electronic Communication from FBI headquarters to all 56 field offices, describing the initiative as “one of the top priorities” of Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and, by extension, of “the Director.” That would be FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III.

The good news is that a majority of agents are already disqualified or otherwise realize this is really stupid (meaning this will flop spectacularly):

Among friends and trusted colleagues, an experienced national security analyst said, “it’s a running joke for us.”

A few of the printable samples:

“Things I Don’t Want On My Resume, Volume Four.”

“I already gave at home.”

“Honestly, most of the guys would have to recuse themselves.”

Let’s just take a look at what’s obscene shall we? Oh yes, Girls Gone Wild is donating all of their proceeds from New Orleans-related sales to the Red Cross:

“Girls Gone Wild” plans to donate 100 percent of the proceeds from the sale of Mardi Gras-themed DVDs and videos to the Red Cross to help Katrina victims, the company said.

“Year after year the city of New Orleans and its citizens have welcomed us with open arms, and we have looked forward to our yearly trip to the Big Easy. The utter destruction of New Orleans and many parts of the Gulf coast truly saddens us,” said Joe Francis, founder and CEO of Girls Gone Wild, in a statement.

Clearly the government must stop this obscenity.

More from The Agitator:

Three weeks ago, it emerged that the Justice Department ordered the FBI to pull officers off of child endangerment cases to crack down on legal porn.


A New Campaign

I’m working on a new political campaign, so don’t expect to see as much of me here for the next few weeks. As one newspaper had already covered Bo (Mark Bodenhausen), we had to announce today, before we were able to complete the website. Hopefully pulling the announcement off on a Monday will place us one day ahead of the last day filers in the news cycle, though.

Feel free to check out the site, submit better graphics, vote in the polls, and otherwise participate in the campaign. I’ll take all the help I can get on this one.

One of the key issues will be eminent domain, which is a very critical issue in Birmingham, Alabama. In addition to the famous WalMart land grab in Alabaster which Neal Boortz covered extensively, a very similar case happened in Roebuck, which is physically in the district where Bo is running. A new case just hit the paper yesterday, and we are working on a response to this one right now.

They once put black people in the back of the bus in Birmingham, until political activists changed how we deal with race issues. They are now putting property owners in the back of the bus, and I guess it is time for political activists to get busy protecting their rights, too.


Losing Public Support? Just Add Insurgents!

We all know public support for the Iraq war is waning, much to the dismay of Bush and company. So what is a military to do to win the public back?

Well, 2 under cover UK soldiers went undercover posing as Arabs and began firing at the Iraqi police!

That’s pretty low. The UK is essentially using it’s own soldiers as fodder to keep stirring up the pot, probably to justify keeping our troops in Iraq to fight those darned insurgents. In summary, our soldiers are there to stop insurgents. And when the insurgents stop attacking, we pick up the slack!

And this was the first time they got caught… it’s unclear how long this may have been going on. After all, if Bush and Blair want to stay in Iraq, is it in their best interest for peace? Peace would mean a pullout, and that puts a big damper on their plans for Iran.

Update by Stephen VanDyke: This is only the tip of the iceberg of this scandal. Sploid is following the full coverage, including the story of how British troops busted their comrades out of jail, freeing 150 inmates in the process:

In a major show of force, British soldiers used tanks to break down the walls of the central jail in this southern city late Monday and freed two Britons, allegedly undercover commandos, who had been arrested on charges of shooting two Iraqi policemen.

About 150 Iraqi prisoners also fled as British commandos stormed inside and rescued their comrades, said Aquil Jabbar, an Iraqi television cameraman who lives across the street from the jail.

Update by Rick Rajter: Wow, these “undercover cops” certainly bring a lot of weaponry on their secret missions… photo courtesy of reuters.

There are some that are speculating (of course we can all speculate and some ideas are plausible and others can be stupid), that the UK and US, with it’s immense desire to stay in Iraq, might be inciting violence and attacks as a reason to stay and prevent these very same attacks! Bizzaro world, strikes again.


Condi Pulls Out the “Latte Defense” Card

Condi angryJust when you think you’ve heard it all… Our ever embarrassing secretary of state says one of the dumbest things I’ve heard in quite some time.

Here’s the situation. Bill O’Reilly actually stops being a Republican cheerleader for a few minutes and begins asking some serious questions. Obviously, Condi has two options. A) Tell the truth B) Pull excuses out of her ass.

You be the judge. The quote:

O’Reilly: The truth of the matter is our correspondents at Fox News can’t go out for a cup of coffee in Baghdad.

Rice: Bill, that’s tough. It’s tough. But what… would they have wanted to have gone out for a cup of coffee when Saddam Hussein was in power?

And folks, there ya have it. The ‘latte defense’. Would they have wanted to get a cup of coffee if Saddam was in power. Let’s extrapolate that logic to further humiliate her for picking option B.

O’Reilly: The truth of the matter is our correspondents at Fox News can’t even take a shit in public restrooms in Baghdad.

Rice: Bill, that’s tough. It’s tough. But what… would they have wanted to take a dump when Saddam Hussein was in power?

Hmmm, I know I sure would have! In fact, I would pretty much rather do all the things I normally do, regardless of who happens to be in power. Heck, from New Orleans have no houses or a place to work. But would they really have wanted to have homes if John Kerry or *gasp* Michael Badnarik was in charge?

These are the tough questions we all must face.

I wish I could make this shit up.

Hat tip to for the article and vid hosting.

( -)-(- )1 comment

Why Did This Happen?

I don’t know if this is true but if it is it proves that government workers allowed people to die after refusing to allow a doctor to treat victims.

In the midst of administering chest compressions to a dying woman several days after Hurricane Katrina struck, Dr. Mark N. Perlmutter was ordered to stop by a federal official because he wasn’t registered with the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

“I begged him to let me continue,” said Perlmutter, who left his home and practice as an orthopedic surgeon in Pennsylvania to come to Louisiana and volunteer to care for hurricane victims. “People were dying, and I was the only doctor on the tarmac (at the Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport) where scores of nonresponsive patients lay on stretchers. Two patients died in front of me.

Read more.

It gets worse.

Gerhart said the scene they confronted at the airport was one of “hundreds of people lying on the ground, many soaked in their own urine and feces, some coding (dying) before our eyes.” FEMA workers initially seemed glad for help and asked Gerhart to work inside the terminal and Perlmutter to work out on the tarmac. They were told only a single obstetrician had been on call at the site for the past 24 hours.

Then, the Coast Guard official informed the group that he could not credential them or guarantee tort coverage and that they should return to Baton Rouge. “That shocked me, that those would be his concerns in a time of emergency,” Gerhart said.

Read full story.

I hope this man is lying but if he is telling the truth it is just more evidence of government corruption.


Posse Comitatus Act, Farewell…

The Posse Comitatus Act is:

…a federal law of the United States (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed in 1878, after the end of Reconstruction, and was intended to prohibit Federal troops from supervising elections in former Confederate states. It generally prohibits Federal military personnel and units of the United States National Guard under Federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress.

It sounds like the PCA is coming under fire and that Bush and Co. are going to use the Katrina disaster to rid us of this pesky law:


President Bush’s push to give the military a bigger role in responding to major disasters like Hurricane Katrina could lead to a loosening of legal limits on the use of federal troops on U.S. soil.


Speaking on the Senate floor Thursday, Sen. John Warner, R-Va., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said, “I believe the time has come that we reflect on the Posse Comitatus Act.” He advocated giving the president and the secretary of defense “correct standby authorities” to manage disasters.

Personally, I believe this SHOULD NOT HAPPEN. The PCA should remain as is.

If there are any Republicans out there who STILL believe that Bush is a conservative… you are lying to yourself.