this is huge, now you’ll be able to install OS X on your DIY beige-box PC [discussion here]
“What pulled me in to the neocon cult however was a combination of American nationalism and group mentality.” [via]
I’ve been mulling over a few posts on other libertarian blogs about marijuana decriminalization and I want to throw out what I think is a good argument for allowing people to use recreational drugs as they choose and focus on addiction prevention instead of prohibition enforcement:
One of the largest recreational drugs in America is Viagra. No one can say with a straight face that taking a drug that prolongs erections isn’t anything other than a pleasure drug. Users intentionally have sex and the resulting orgasm dramatically increases dopamine levels in the brain, not unlike the effects of using prohibited drugs like marijuana. Viagra is also characteristically “” in the same sense as marijuana — psychologically.
Does anyone know if there are any other kinds of prescription drugs that would fit the description of recreational drugs, based on the previous observation?
UPDATE: In related news, the SCOTUS handed down a judgement today ruling. O’Connor, one of those dissenting, said the federal government was overreaching to endorse “making it a federal crime to grow small amounts of marijuana in one’s own home for one’s own medicinal use.” In an era of increasing centralism (which used to be a liberal/Democrat ideal that has been hijacked by conservatives/Republicans in recent years), this decision shouldn’t be much of a shock, but what is surprising is how apple-pie the ones who seem to be.
UPDATE 2: The plaintiffs are going to defy the ruling anyways.
“I’m going to have to be prepared to be arrested,” said Diane Monson, who smokes marijuana several times a day to relieve back pain.
10-to-1 odds says this guy has his home raided and is carted off within the month. I think the drug war may start heating up and getting lots of press coverage if that happens. The LNC needs to start paying attention here, a well-timed (and toned) press release would do wonders for libertarian visibility.
UPDATE 3: Even Reagan Republicans are having a hard time swallowing the failed War on Drugs. Economist Milton Friedman has come out swinging in favor of marijuana reform:
At 92, Friedman is revered as one of the great champions of free-market capitalism during the years of U.S. rivalry with Communism. He is also passionate about the need to legalize marijuana, among other drugs, for both financial and moral reasons.
“There is no logical basis for the prohibition of marijuana,” the economist says, “$7.7 billion is a lot of money, but that is one of the lesser evils. Our failure to successfully enforce these laws is responsible for the deaths of thousands of people in Colombia. I haven’t even included the harm to young people. It’s absolutely disgraceful to think of picking up a 22-year-old for smoking pot. More disgraceful is the denial of marijuana for medical purposes.”
He and 500 other economists from around the U.S. today will publicly endorse a Harvard University economist’s report on the costs of marijuana prohibition. The report cites that instead of spending $7.7 billion in combined state and federal spending a year, taxation would yield up to $6.2 billion a year.
UPDATE 4: Coyote Blog points out an interesting duplicity in that the ruling was made on the basis that homegrown weed cut into the profits of illegal intrastate traffickers:
lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department argued to the Supreme Court that homegrown marijuana represented interstate commerce, because the garden patch weed would affect “overall production” of the weed, much of it imported across American borders by well-financed, often violent drug gangs
By the way, think about that for a minute. They are arguing that home-grown weed would “affect” the inter-state commerce of “violent drug gangs”. How would it affect it? It would reduce their commerce! So the feds are claiming purview over home-grown pot because it would, what? Unfairly reduce the inter-state trade of violent drug gangs?
“Because of the situation we’re in now, I would not want my son to serve. [...] It’s the policy that I’m against, not the military.”
a libertarian children’s book for indoctrinating your little ones into liberty-land 
From ABC News — (subtitle) New Training Camps Seen in Pakistan:
And footage shows al Qaeda seems to have set up new training camps inside Pakistan, similar to the ones that were dismantled in Afghanistan. The tapes show a new generation of militants, some no older than 10 or 12, carrying automatic weapons.
And tonight, the United States of America makes the following demands on the Taliban: Deliver to United States authorities all the leaders of al Qaeda who hide in your land. Release all foreign nationals, including American citizens, you have unjustly imprisoned. Protect foreign journalists, diplomats and aid workers in your country. Close immediately and permanently every terrorist training camp in Afghanistan, and hand over every terrorist, and every person in their support structure, to appropriate authorities. Give the United States full access to terrorist training camps, so we can make sure they are no longer operating.
I await a similar address to Pakistan, but the cynic in me knows this is going to get shoved under the rug and out of sight hard and fast by the administration.
Because hey, at least the vaporware WMDs in Iraq won’t be falling into their hands anytime soon, word.
» Al Qaeda Clashes Caught on Tape [ABC News]
» George W. Bush’s Address to Congress and the American People [transcript]
This is to remind everyone who is an RSS-only subscriber that this isn’t the only Hammer of Truth feed anymore. Along with the redesign came the HoT Line, which is condensed links and content that otherwise wouldn’t make it to the site before, but is still chock full of interesting links.
Thanks to the awesomeness of FeedBurner, you can subscribe easily with your favorite RSS reader by just following this link.
In related feed news, the number of subscribers for the main feed is now steadily over 100 on a daily basis, which is quite the growth from a year ago, as you can see in this nifty graph (the canyons are where I broke feeds during upgrades, woops).
well put-together flash music video (weird voice); I have doubts a draft would fly very far with this generation 
technically his wife had it, but he named her Moxie CrimeFighter Jillette; it’s supposed to be funny, I think
Because I’d like to help Free Talk Live take off and to show my support (and because I could only vote once for their podcast ballot thingie), I have added a little script to the front page sidebar that displays an link to FTL along with the current show time only during times when they are on the air.
I think it’s pretty cute and if anyone wants the PHP code, just ask.
This is just ludicrous:
With the U.S. Army spending $100 a gallon to buy gasoline and lug it to Iraq and Afghanistan for Humvees, the brass wants to cut its fuel costs. One possible solution: the Army National Automotive Center’s push to boost the market for hybrid engine technology.
Ok, let me be the first to inform the Pentagon that if they can’t seem to find a way to fill the Humvees for less than $100/gal while driving smack dab in the center of the oil-rich Middle East… perhaps the problem isn’t fuel economy and the solution isn’t hybrid engines.
I don’t know, just a theory here.
» Hybrid Vehicles In Camouflage [BusinessWeek]
This has been circulating in my inbox for a couple days — Hormone Spray Is Found To Bolster Trust in Others:
Ernst Fehr, director of the Institute for Empirical Research in Economics at the University of Zurich and one of the scientists who conducted the experiment, said the peak effect of oxytocin was seen after about 50 minutes and it wore off after two hours.
“Some may worry about the prospect that political operators will generously spray the crowd with oxytocin at rallies of their candidates,” said neurologist Antonio R. Damasio of the University of Iowa, who has long studied the neurobiology of human emotions and who wrote a commentary accompanying the study.
At the same time, he added in an interview, politicians and marketers were probably already triggering the natural release of oxytocin in the brains of audiences through their campaigns. “I am more alarmed about the manipulations of marketing than the possibility of oxytocin sprays,” he said.
Huh, so it turns out Big Brother is actually a cologne, whoddathunk?
But seriously, how long do you think it will take before car dealerships install oxytoxin spritzers at the showroom door and auto industry profits shoot through the roof?
Ok, I was willing to give the Pentagon the benefit of the doubt after. Now, I’m not so sure after reading of what really happened:
A U.S. military investigation into the mishandling of the Muslim holy book at the Guantanamo Bay prison for suspected terrorists has determined that detainees — not U.S. soldiers — attempted to flush the Quran down the toilet there.
However, the report did find four confirmed incidents in which U.S. personnel at the base mishandled the Quran, including guards kicking a detainee’s Quran; a guard’s urine “splashed” a detainee and his holy book after coming through an air vent; and guards got in a water balloon fight that resulted in two detainees’ Qurans getting wet.
In a fifth confirmed incident, it could not be determined whether a guard or a detainee wrote a two-word obscenity in a detainee’s Quran.
Ok, just a quick guess on the obscenity in the last incident: F*&k Allah. Totally unsubstantiated guess.
So let’s get this straight: a guard was taking a leak, and he was a bit of a slob who couldn’t aim, and he pissed in an air vent (in the ceiling or in the floor, ponder that), and amazingly the detainee’s Quran was right under that vent. Something makes me wonder what kind of HVAC and plumbing work our tax money is paying for.
And as for the water balloon fight that resulted in not one but two detainees’ Qurans getting wet… well, let’s just say when the guards testified they were engaging in watersports with detainees Qurans, someone was taking liberty with the definition.
But hey, Newsweek can suck a fat one, because the guards clearly did everything short of actually flushing the Quran, so stick that in your pipe and smoke it, America haters.
» [CNN] [via cryptogon]
In addition, the U.S. invasion of nuke-free Iraq and its restraint with nuke-armed North Korea send a signal that other nations should secretly accelerate efforts to acquire nuclear weapons since they deter U.S. intervention. U.S. actions encourage the nuclear proliferation it is intended to prevent.
Every so often, FOXNEWS has a moment of libertarian zen, in another article, they also hilite the possible proliferation that has taken place of dual-use materials while Iraq has been under U.S. control:
U.N. inspectors have been blocked from returning to Iraq since the U.S.-led war in 2003 so they have been using satellite photos to see what happened to the sites that were subject to U.N. monitoring because their equipment had both civilian and military uses.
[... Acting chief weapons inspector Demetrius Perricos] said imagery analysts have identified 109 sites that have been emptied of equipment to varying degrees, up from 90 reported in March.
So, the war we were sold as neccessary in order to stop weapons of mass destruction (related program activities) from being given to terrorists has now resulted in the same equipment being carted off to God knows where now that the U.S. government has gained control of Iraq. Fucking genius.
Which all begs the question: When did FOXNEWS join the liberal media in hating that we invaded Iraq in order to promote freedom and democracy?
I’m now a proud listener of the unabashedly libertarian-slanted Free Talk Live (via ):
Free Talk Live is talk radio unlike any other. In an industry where shows are either pro-republican or pro-democrat, Free Talk Live is unabashedly pro-FREEDOM.
Another hallmark of typical talk radio is heavy call screening. Certain hosts are afraid of certain issues. Free Talk Live is not. We call the show Free Talk Live because listeners are Free to call in and Talk about anything from the political to the personal. We’re also Live 6 days per week.
Don’t like the topic? Don’t tune out. Call and change it.
Got something you just have to get off your chest? Call.
Want to argue with a caller who’s on the air? Call and let us know.
Color me impressed. You can tune in online or via their(8 FM, 5 AM) or subscribe to their (though don’t bother calling the phone number, durrr).
Apparently they also need help kicking their rank up in the Podcast Alley popularity ranking (they were #1 for May and want to do it again), so go ahead andby voting for them (hey, the more popular the show is, the more exposure it gets, and that means more exposure for libertarians in general).
I almost fell for this until I saw “Ã‚Â© 2005 Touchstone Television” at the bottom of the site and did some Googling
I hope you all had ample time to take a potty break and visit our lurvly advertisers during the past week, because Hammer of Truth is back in form later this evening (once I get properly drunk and read through the Drudge Report for political stuff that makes me bang on keyboard and form incoherent ranting sentences and perhaps full paragraphs).
In the meantime, drop a line to our friend(s?) over at The Decadent West and ask them why they haven’t posted anything new in ages. I mean, shit… Hammer of Truth may not have a leg to stand on when it comes to regular updating, but our style is nothing like the sweet crack-rock DW was handing out.
I’ll never get this blog past level 3, though I have done the hiatus thing a few times
I wanted to throw this out there quickly before I head out.
For me to even apply, I’d have to adhere to these 3 principles (and I won’t):
- Pragmatic domestic libertarian; Hawk on defense
- Hobbesian libertarian
- Big-Tent libertarian
Let’s dissect these:
Pragmatic domestic libertarian; Hawk on defense
This is two in one… so I’m only addressing the first part. I’m in total agreement on domestic libertarianism when it means less government and greater liberty. The classic term is socially liberal, fiscally conservative. I can only hope they mean the same thing. However, this is clearly cancelled out by the Hobbesian crud below.
Hawk on defense
(in which they quote Dale Franks: “If the 1930s and 1940s taught us anything it should be that it is no longer possible for us to confine ourselves to our shores secure in immunity from attack. [As] tragic as it may be, sometimes foreigners are going to need to be killed, and I’d rather kill them over in Kaplokistan, than do so by sniping at them from the rubble of San Diego.”)
What an utter load of malarky. I still don’t get this warped mindset that says we should invade country X after country Y has attacked us simply because they looked at us wrong. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a huge proponent of hunting down Al Qaida in Afghanistan, Pakistan or wherever they are and sticking some terrorist heads on pikes, but don’t hornswaggle me with collusion theory between the socialist dictator Saddam Hussein and islamonihilist Osama bin Laden when there’s no facts to back it up. I’m not buying it.
Which is defined: “the philosophical system of Thomas Hobbes; especially : the Hobbesian theory that people have a fundamental right to self-preservation and to pursue selfish aims but will relinquish these rights to an absolute monarch in the interest of common safety and happiness”
Ok, let me just say: WTF?! Even the most right-wing christian conservative would blink at this bit of nuttery.
QandO explained: If this isn’t a terribly specific description of Neolibertarianism, see one of the short descriptions listed above: Big-Tent libertarianism. As with any political movement, there is a broad cross-section of opinions. Neolibertarianism merely attempts to make libertarianism politically relevant, without the exclusionary barriers of the ideological Libertarians.
I’m all for big tent libertarianism, but not when it’s clear that it’s neo-conservative hawks beckoning us to join in their revival and… Hallelujah! Pass the donation tray my brothas and sistas. AMEN!
And to add injury to insult, QandO is publishing a newsletter called The New Libertarian. Personally, I hope Tim West drops the dime on them with whoever forced him to drop that as his blog name for copyright reasons.
I suggest libertarians with any sense steer clear of this neocon network in libertarian’s clothing. Hell, even Instapoopie isn’t that stupid.
[If you need some high-volume libertarian commentary to tide you over for the meantime, check out either Free Will Blog or lesser-volume more-feminine Jacqueline Mackie Paisley Passey (quite the mouthful, and I don't mean that as a double entendre).]
I’ll be out of town for a few days for a family function and probably won’t be able to post much, if at all. However, I decided to dig up an old article from the Hammer of Truth treasure trove for everyone to enjoy in the interim: Real Whitehouse.
The characters are a bit dated (a couple have left the administration), but I’m still very proud of this piece, written as an homage to the late, great Hunter S. Thompson.
As a bonus, here’s an oldie comic strip that applies every time Bush goes to meet with injured soldiers (almost guaranteed he’ll do it again this coming Memorial Day): Bring ‘Em On!
“by 2050 we would expect to be able to download your mind into a machine” (I’m more interested in uploads, vis-à-vis Battlefield Earth and The Matrix) [via]