Hurricanes Are Also Black

Brian J. once again brings an important topic to my attention.

He contends sheds light on the question of whether racism is being used since blacks are not getting hurricanes named after them (I thought this ended in the sixties when people protested in the streets for the right to have hurricanes named after them).

The congressional newspaper the Hill reported this week that Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, feels that the current names are too “lily white,” and is seeking to have better representation for names reflecting African-Americans and other ethnic groups.

“All racial groups should be represented,” Lee said, according to the Hill. She hoped federal weather officials “would try to be inclusive of African-American names.”

Click here to read full story.

I have a dream one day we will live in an America where black storms are allowed to exist.

Now I can’t help but think what would happen if we started naming storms after blacks we would all be racists for doing so. Which goes to prove affirmative action is bullshit especially when used to name hurricanes. Read Article 1, Section 8 and show me where Congress derives the power to name storms.

Update by Stephen VanDyke: Woops, I was trying to clean up a couple of Jake’s grammar errors in the post and accidentally ended up changing the context. Sorry Brian J, didn’t mean to misrepresent you.


Pirates & Emperors: Libertarian Schoolhouse Rock?

Pirates and EmperorsI’ve been having a conversation with a few people about educating the public on libertarian points of view using Schoolhouse Rock type animations when I remembered that someone has already done a short a while ago that brings up the duplicity in allowing the government to commit crimes that would put individuals in jail.

In the cartoon Pirates and Emperors (video), the tale starts in Roman times and quickly moves forward to paint a duplicitous foreign policy around the world, ending in Iraq:

ALEXANDER THE GREAT: What meanest thou by keeping hostile possession of the sea?

PIRATE: What meanest thou by seizing the whole earth; because I do it with a petty ship, I’m called a robber, whilst thou who dost the same with a great fleet art styled emperor.

It’s sharp and witty and handily reiterates the libertarian ideal of minding our own business (“Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations; entangling alliances with none.” Thomas Jefferson).

I hoping the author has plans for more of these libertarian-ish common sense cartoons in the future.

After Googling “libertarian schoolhouse rock:” Benjamin over at Libertarian Longhorns wrote:

I find one of the most difficult libertarian positions to defend is non-interventionist. It’s hard to defend the idea of not coming to the aid of victims. Unfortunately good intentions in the minds of common people and in the minds of our leaders, turn out to be wrong, often disastrously so. Since WWII, the U.S. has supported, then rebuked a long line of tyrants. The philosophy of “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” has led to supporting Saddam, the Mujahideen, the Shah of Iran, and many others.


AP Misquote or ACLU Misstatement?

I wrote about the ACLU appearing to accept new 4th Amendment violations the other day. The key issue was over this statement, which originated from an AP article:

Howard Simon, executive director of ACLU of Florida, said the Miami initiative appears aimed at ensuring that people’s rights are not violated.

“What we’re dealing with is officers on street patrol, which is more effective and more consistent with the Constitution,” Simon said. “We’ll have to see how it is implemented.”

The point I was making is that it appears Mr. Simon is excusing the plans of the Miami cops because they are doing better at complying with the Constitution. As this is typically not the position of the ACLU, I also provided for the potential of a misquote with this line:

While I’m not at all surprised by another usurpation of our rights as American citizens, I am deeply upset (assuming the quotation above is correct) that an ACLU spokesperson has become an apologist for the police state.

It seems the official ACLU line is that Simon was misquoted by the AP. Below is the message we received from them this morning:

AP misquoted our Executive Director, Howard Simon, and ran a correction on the wire. Can you please clarify this for your readers? Thanks.

Here’s our response:

For Immediate Release:
Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Alessandra Soler Meetze at 305-576-2337 ext. 16.

ACLU Statement on Miami Shield Program

There is some confusion over the specifics of the “Miami Shield” Program. Reports differ as to whether the plan involves large squads of officers stopping everyone at a locale and then demanding people to produce identification. Although the Miami Police Department has claimed that “Miami Shield” will respect people’s right, much of its constitutionality will depend on how the program is implemented.

If police officers plan on stopping people and demanding identification without any reason to believe that there is criminal activity, that is unconstitutional.

When law enforcement stops people based on individualized suspicion of wrongdoing, that is always both more effective and consistent with constitutional principles.

Other post 9-11 law enforcement tactics such as randomly searching subway users in New York City or conducting mass pat-down searches of everyone entering the Raymond James Football Stadium in Tampa violate constitutional principles and are a waste of law enforcement resources.

We’ve asked for a link to or the wording of the retraction, but have not received a response, yet. I’m curious as to whether a mistake was made and the ACLU is trying to cover for it after the fact, or if the AP reporter got the quote wrong in the first place.

In an effort to keep our reporting fair and balanced (Bill O’Reilly should take some notes on this), we’ll try to provide all sides of the story here at HoT.

UPDATE: Suzette M. Laboy, Broadcast Editor for the AP of Florida sent me the following retraction they issued:

MIAMI (AP) – In a Nov. 28 story about the Miami Police Department’s new counterterrorism initiative, a police official discussing a hypothetical exercise said that officers might surround a bank building and check the identities of people entering and leaving. The story should have made clear that police will not be checking identification without cause.

Unfortunately, this does not clarify much. If it is an exercise (as opposed to a real terrorist incident), then any identity checking still would be done without cause.

Update by Stephen VanDyke: Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the “hypothetical” that was presented by the AP as being told by the police. Oddly enough, Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez and police spokesman Angel Calzadilla are interchangeable:

Original version (Nov 28th): Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez said officers might, for example, surround a bank building, check the IDs of everyone going in and out and hand out leaflets about terror threats.

Updated version (Nov 30th): As an example, uniformed and plainclothes officers might surround a bank building unannounced, contact the manager about ways to be vigilant against terrorists, and hand out leaflets in three languages to customers and people passing by, police spokesman Angel Calzadilla said.

MORE UPDATES by Stephen Gordon: The ACLU statement is now posted on their website.

Alessandra Soler Meetze of the FL ACLU sent this to us by e-mail:

The revised AP story is [linked here]. As you can see the story states — “[Calzadilla] said there would be no random checks of identification.” And it includes the correct quote from Simon.

It is interesting to note the change from:

“What we’re dealing with is officers on street patrol, which is more effective and more consistent with the Constitution,” Simon said. “We’ll have to see how it is implemented.”


“What we’re dealing with is officers on street patrol (making informed decisions on which individuals to stop), which is more effective and more consistent with the Constitution,” Simon said. “We’ll have to see how it is implemented.”

With all of the oopsies (hopefully) out of the way, maybe we can get back to the real issue of combating the increasing usurpation of our civil liberties.


New Ladies of Liberty Calendar Planned

Ladies of Liberty - TinaRachel Mills asks whether it’s time for another Ladies of Liberty calendar (not updated since 2003, 2004). Unfortunately, she’s estimating it will 2009 before it may become a reality:

So what about a high-concept calendar based on Ladies of Liberty behind door #3? Each month deals with one issue and we have the conservative position, the liberal position – both problematic and with lot of mixed media art and captions explaining why. Then there is a paper flap labeled door #3 and the Lady of Liberty is behind that on stark white representing the views of freedom.

Each month would be a lot to look at, a lot to absorb, very different from the last 2.

Production would be a pain. Have to print double the sheets and might have to assemble them myself for that little cutout feature to work… It would be a fun artsy project tho and I have 2 years….


It’s been too long since there’s been any beautiful libertarian eye-candy to adorn the walls around here, and it seems that dry spell may continue a few more years (I gladly let them adorn my arm in the interim). I hope Rachel realizes there’s a huge market potential for this (uh, ever heard of Slashdot or and could make a pretty penny simply by putting out a high-quality version every year (keeping it fresh of course).

UPDATE by Stephen Gordon: Mills is aware of the market potential. One site mentions coverage just from one year:

Rachel Mills, the North Carolina statehouse candidate who starred in the “Ladies of Liberty” lingerie calendar, generated coverage from the Washington Post, the Associated Press and appeared on three national TV shows: Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor, MS/NBC’s “Nachman” and CNN’s “Crossfire.”


NOLA Mayor: I need 512kbps WiFi, man…

Ray Nagin - AFP file photoNew Orleans mayor Ray Nagin has announced a plan to blanket the entire city in free WiFi within a year to help boost the economy:

“What we learned is a network like this is important as a backup in case all other communications fail,” the mayor said.

The system uses hardware mounted on street lights. Most of the $1 million in equipment was donated by three companies: Intel Corp., Tropos Networks Inc. and Pronto Networks. The companies also plan to donate equipment for the citywide expansion.

The network uses “mesh” technology to pass the wireless signal from pole to pole rather than each Wi-Fi transmitter being plugged directly into a physical network cable. That way, laptop users will be able to connect even in areas where the wireline phone network will take time to restore.

The system will provide download speeds of 512 kilobits per second as long as the city remains under a state of emergency. But the bandwidth will be slowed to 128 kbps in accordance with a limit set by Louisiana’s law once the city’s state of emergency is lifted at an unknown future date.

Because the next time the levees are breached, residents can rejoice knowing they can still check their email while trapped in their attics.

[ * Post title is a reference to a previous Nagin quote]


Robbing Peter to Pay Politicians

While most of us have been rightfully railing hard against the Ermächtigungsgesetz Patriot Act and Homeland Stupidity Security, we’ve not been paying as much attention to another civil liberty slowly eroding away. Fortunately for us, Russmo has been on the ball, and provides us with his latest in a long series of timely political cartoons. Asset forfeiture may apply to more than just drug dealers, too. Common household items may be enough to have your home and car seized, as Reason’s Jacob Sullum provides:

Hard as this collateral damage is to justify, it pales next to that suffered by other innocent victims of the government’s war on methamphetamine. Last summer, for instance, state and federal agents arrested 49 convenience store clerks and owners in Georgia on charges they sold pseudoephedrine and other supplies to informants posing as meth cooks.

The supplies, including matches, charcoal, antifreeze, coffee filters, aluminum foil, and cat litter, were all perfectly legal. The charges, carrying penalties of up to 25 years in prison as well as fines and asset forfeiture, are based on the doubtful premise the defendants knew or should have known what the fake customers pretended to be planning.

So where does all the seized money go? Sam Vaknin provides us with his view:

According to David McClintick (“Swordfish: A True Story of Ambition, Savagery, and Betrayal”), in the late 1980’s, the FBI and DEA set up dummy corporations to deal in drugs. They funneled into these corporate fronts money from drug-related asset seizures.

The idea was to infiltrate global crime networks but a lot of the money in “Operation Swordfish” may have ended up in the wrong pockets. Government agents and sheriffs got mysteriously and filthily rich and the whole sorry affair was wound down. The GAO reported more than $3.6 billion missing. This bit of history gave rise to at least one blockbuster with Oscar-winner Halle Berry.

Alas, slush funds are much less glamorous in reality. They usually involve grubby politicians, pawky bankers, and philistine businessmen – rather than glamorous hackers and James Bondean secret agents.

The asset forfeitures continue, as well as graft and corruption in high places. Thomas Jefferson defined tyranny as “that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.” If in doubt about whether we live under a tyranny today, I’d recommend that you go purchase a case of Sudafed, some coffee filters and a few gallons of antifreeze. Before you begin your shopping spree, I have one simple recommendation: Please consider donating your house and other assets to charity.


Iraq Exit Plan Translated

Will the political posturing on both sides ever end? From the AFP:

The White House for the first time has claimed possession of an Iraq withdrawal plan, arguing that a troop pullout blueprint unveiled this past week by a Democratic senator was “remarkably similar” to its own.

[…] The statement late Saturday by White House spokesman Scott McClellan came in response to a commentary published in The Washington Post by Joseph Biden, the top Democrat of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in which he said US forces will begin leaving Iraq next year “in large numbers.”

Translation: We are cutting and running, while calling it a victory and saying that the Democrats were in favor of more drastic cutting and running, while using the same plan they proposed.

McClellan said the White House now saw “a strong consensus” building in Washington in favor of Bush’s strategy in Iraq.

Translation: The new strategy will not include Mission Accomplished banners and Bush wearing a flight suit. And by consensus, we mean we have changed our positions in order to be part of that consensus.

Even if conditions on the ground there improve, “I have to admit that I think the chances are not a lot better than 50-50,” [Biden] said.

“Are we going to have traded a dictator for chaos? Or are we going to have traded a dictator for a stable Iraq? That’s the real question. And that depends on the president’s actions from here out,” said Biden.

Translation: EVERYONE TRADE PLACES! I am the hawk and you are the pussy. I will now hedge my bets in case my idea of leaving Iraq fails, then I can blame you for the plan I endorse.

The Biden plan calls for preparatory work to be done in the first six months of next year, ahead of the envisaged pullout. It includes:

– forging a compromise among Iraqi factions, under which the Sunnis must accept that they no longer rule Iraq and Shiites and Kurds admit them into a power-sharing arrangement;

– building Iraq’s governing capacity;

– transferring authority to Iraqi security forces;

– establishing a contact group of the world’s major powers to become the Iraqi government’s primary international interlocutor.

Translation: And it’s going to work this time, because the Senate voted on it. The vote itself has transformed Iraq into a stable democracy where we can now forget about all the people there who simply want to kill American soldiers.

“The fact is that the Senate amendment reiterates the president’s strategy in Iraq,” the statement said.

Translation: If this fails, it will all be your fault because you voted on it. GOTCHA AGAIN!

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Iraq Exit Plan Translated

ACLU Apologist for the Police State?

This one is pretty damned scary:

Miami police announced Monday they will stage random shows of force at hotels, banks and other public places to keep terrorists guessing and remind people to be vigilant.

Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez said officers might, for example, surround a bank building, check the IDs of everyone going in and out and hand out leaflets about terror threats.

There goes the Fourth Amendment and what particles remain of the Fifth.

“People are definitely going to notice it,” Fernandez said. “We want that shock. We want that awe. But at the same time, we don’t want people to feel their rights are being threatened. We need them to be our eyes and ears.”

Geez, like we need more shock and awe these days. What’s the plan, to intimidate honest citizens into being snitches for the jackbooted thugs. It is comforting to know that they “don’t want people to feel their rights are being threatened” — except for that quirky little 4th Amendment thing.

Howard Simon, executive director of ACLU of Florida, said the Miami initiative appears aimed at ensuring that people’s rights are not violated.

“What we’re dealing with is officers on street patrol, which is more effective and more consistent with the Constitution,” Simon said. “We’ll have to see how it is implemented.”

I’ve been actively supportive of the ACLU on this general issue, as they have been leading the way with respect to fighting the Patriot Act and related infringements of our civil rights. This time, I’ve got to hold their feet to the fire. The admission that the Miami Model is “more consistent with the Constitution” logically means that it is not consistent with the Constitution.

While I’m not at all surprised by another usurpation of our rights as American citizens, I am deeply upset (assuming the quotation above is correct) that an ACLU spokesperson has become an apologist for the police state.

Update by Stephen VanDyke: Radley Balko weighs in, saying “If the terrorists hate us for our freedom, then holy shit are we ever appeasing the terrorists.”

Another update by Stephen VanDyke: A modified version of the story in the Washington Post quotes police spokesman Angel Calzadilla as saying “there would be no random checks of identification.” Did the stink on the blogosphere drive them to drop the idea?

Yet another update by SV: Free Talk Live, home of the bestest libertarian talk radio, had a great hour of discussion on their show (MP3 link).

Update by Stephen Gordon: The ACLU is now claiming that Mr. Simon was misquoted. Details here.


Wishful Thinking: Bush Disapproval = Dem Wins

blue state wishful thinkingA set of maps with a blue-washing of states to represent a recent SurveyUSA polling of Americans who disapprove of Bush’s job performance was posted at DailyKos today and has been picked up by several Democrat outlets.

Yet one commenter actually had some insight to the reality of what the polls represent:

First, there’s no doubt that the Republicans party is bleeding out of its center, but I wonder how much of it is bleeding out to the right (or to the northeast and southeast, for the political compass junkies). I imagine many hardcore libertarians are starting to take the third party option much more seriously.

Secondly, many expected that there had been bleeding from the fundamentalist wing over the Miers nomination, and that Alito would bring some of Bush’s number back up, but so far, that doesn’t seem to the case. Either that assumption about poll numbers was wrong, or the fundies are waiting to see if Bush can deliver an Alito nomination, or I guess some of them could also be taking the third party option more seriously, and he’ll have trouble winning them back.

Either way, people moving to third parties on the right isn’t the formula for Democratic success, but it surely helps them a great deal when also picking up moderates (hopefully in droves).

The fact is, libertarian publicity seem to be doing quite well in the wake of Bush’s low approval ratings (along with low support for Democrats or Republicans in general) and a weak Democrat rhetoric (which can often be boiled down to “no, you suck more”).

As the saying goes: don’t count your chickens until they hatch. Democrats shouldn’t assume just because there’s discontent with Republicans that there’s going to be a shift back to voting for them. If you’ll pardon the pun, the failed policies of both major parties may finally come home to roost.


Freedom of the Press Suppressed in Tennessee HS

In a move sure to make members of the Bush administration proud, an Oak Ridge Tennessee high school principle named Becky Ervin has shut down the school newspaper and seized copies which had already been distributed.

Tennessee Independent Media Center reports:

Administrators late Tuesday searched through teachers’ rooms and desks and seized copies, they said. The inter-school mail system delivering copies was halted, and the newspaper returned. Bundles of papers were removed from teachers’ mailboxes, Grooms [the newspaper advisor] said.

Grooms said she was told to retrieve “all copies that went home. I picked up one copy from one student.”

The students don’t seem to be standing down, though.

“The school administration should realize they don’t have the power to censor our paper,” [the paper’s Editor-in-Chief Brittany] Thomas said, while fellow students gathered around her living room late Wednesday afternoon to hand-paint T-shirts they plan to wear to school on Monday in protest.

According to the Boston Globe, the issues at stake are tattoos and birth control:

The Oak Leaf’s birth control article listed success rates for different methods, and said contraceptives were available from doctors and the local health department. Superintendent Tom Bailey said the article needed to be edited so that it would be acceptable to all the school.

The edition also contained a photo of an unidentified student’s tattoo, which the student had not told her parents about, said Bailey.

”I have a problem with the idea of putting something in the paper that makes us a part of hiding something from the parents,” Bailey said.

And we can be sure this infuriated the control freaks even more:

However, this time a quote from a health department doctor explaining pregnant teens rights to privacy went too far.

“I don’t think we should be condoning anything that tries to suggest a school newspaper or a school’s mission is to keep things from parents,” Dr. Bailey said.

To the students at Oak Ridge High: We know what it is like to have to resort to samizdat news coverage. That’s why we run this website. Our presidential candidate was arrested last year, and I’ll bet most of you never even heard about it. Please bear in mind that many authorities at all levels will try to suppress journalistic expression. Journalism classes and school newspapers are supposed to teach students what it is like in the real world. The way things are going politically, this may soon be the case.

Contact: Principal Becky Ervin or Superintendent Thomas Bailey. Props.

Update by Stephen VanDyke: I know this is a bit late, but I wanted to note this comment from Fark:

Fark censorship

Senior Congressman Guilty: $2.4M in Bribes

Rep Cunningham statementIn a story that is sure to rock the “Moral Majority” [ed- on second thought, they seem to pick and choose their morals] wing of the Republican Party, eight-term California Representative Randy “Duke” Cunningham pleaded guilty Monday to conspiracy and tax charges and tearfully resigned from office. From the Associated Press:

In a statement, prosecutors said Cunningham admitted to receiving at least $2.4 million in bribes paid to him by several conspirators through a variety of methods, including checks totaling over $1 million, cash, rugs, antiques, furniture, yacht club fees and vacations.

“He did the worst thing an elected official can do _ he enriched himself through his position and violated the trust of those who put him there,” U.S. Attorney Carol Lam said. The statement did not identify the conspirators.

The case began when authorities started investigating whether Cunningham and his wife, Nancy, used the proceeds from the $1,675,000 sale to defense contractor Mitchell Wade to buy the $2.55 million mansion in Rancho Santa Fe. Wade put the Del Mar house back on the market and sold it after nearly a year for $975,000 _ a loss of $700,000.

Actually, I don’t care what his political affiliation is, I just hope he ends up sharing a cell with former Ohio Rep. James Traficant.

Update: There might be something in the water down in San Diego that leads to corruption, as this is the 4th high-profile case of the year. Two city council members got swatted and the mayor pulled out all the stops when he was found guilty of corruption… his first day in office.

Another Update: Defense Tech has more details on his military accomplishments and that the Air Force (and their defense contractors) are losing a powerful ally.


“Trophy” Video: Contractors Shooting Civilians

Iraq trophy video stillThe Sunday Telegraph reports that “a ‘trophy’ video appearing to show security guards in Baghdad randomly shooting Iraqi civilians has sparked two investigations after it was posted on the internet.” The video, which was originally posted on an adjunct employee website of UK private security contractor Aegis Defence Ltd, is set to the music of Elvis:

In one of the videoed attacks, a Mercedes is fired on at a distance of several hundred yards before it crashes in to a civilian taxi. In the last clip, a white civilian car is raked with machine gun fire as it approaches an unidentified security company vehicle. Bullets can be seen hitting the vehicle before it comes to a slow stop.

There are no clues as to the shooter but either a Scottish or Irish accent can be heard in at least one of the clips above Elvis Presley’s Mystery Train, the music which accompanies the video.

The wanton disregard for human life displayed in the video has led some to question the role and accountability of private security contractors in Iraq (at one point a Humvee is seen driving on a parallel road with no intervention).

You can see the video for yourself here and here. (via Political Wire)

Update by Stephen Gordon: I just FTPed the video in Windows Media and Quicktime to save bandwidth for the sites linked above.


Marijuana No Longer the Key Gateway Drug

Anecdotal data already indicate that Viagra use leads to pornography, polygamy, and even death. If this trend continues, older people may actually start engaging in sexual activites which don’t even include the missionary position. Considering the absurd position of the DEA on marijuana prohibition, these data should already be more than enough to forever prohibit this evil drug which actually can kill.

New evidence suggests that Viagra is the pill of choice for people using illicit recreational drugs. From the article:

“Viagra has been the number one party pill since it was released,” said Paul Quigley, emergency medicine specialist at Wellington Hospital.

Partygoers report many party pills and illicit drugs make them amorous but unable to perform. They see Viagra and other similar drugs as the perfect finale to their weekend cocktail.

“Most recreational drugs make you very randy but you can’t do much about it,” said Quigley, an expert in recreational drugs. “That’s the standard mix to go out in the evening – to make sure you take some Viagra with you.”

Viagra is a common addition to illegal party pill packs combined with “uppers” for Friday and Saturday night, as well as “downers” to help clubbers sleep on Sunday before work.

Not only might one argue that Viagra is frequently abused by people taking it for recreational use, but it also leads to more dangerous activities. The strength of the DEA argument against marijuana has always rested on the distortion fact that marijuana is a gateway drug. Viagra is much more of a gateway drug, as it is not only associated with the use of hard (no pun intended) drugs, but it also leads to such things as marital enhancement for those with erectile dysfunction and the restoration of healthy sex lives for our elderly. Like marijuana, it must be outlawed today before our society slips into further decay.

Update By Jake Porter: Let’s not forget the government funded Viagra.


Norwegian Expansion of Bush Policy: All Children Left Behind

Not wishing to be outdone by the US, Norway seems to be working on a plan specifically designed to leave all children behind. Aftenposten reports on a proposal to revise the way history is to be taught in the land which bore Thor Heyerdahl and Roald Amundsen:

The new program leaves out the world wars, the Russian Revolution, the Cold War, and does not mention the topics of Nazism or Communism.

The world wars are potentially included under a clause that would allow teachers and students “to choose and examine two or more recent international conflicts, and assess cause and effect”.

The reform would further complicate the teaching of general education by reducing the number of hours of history to two hours a week.

We already know the results of teaching revisionist history in the United States. Let’s just hope that Norway doesn’t forget its proud history of resisting the Nazi occupation, so this piece of soon to be verboten history doesn’t repeat itself.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Norwegian Expansion of Bush Policy: All Children Left Behind

Missing Home: the Good, Bad and Indifferent

I am still in Bangkok and I am enjoying a quiet moment. Jet lag has the rest of the family in bed and I am feeling a bit homesick. To combat that ache, I opened and went to my normal starting point- the Op-Ed page. Sunday’s letters section is always grouped by subject matter, and of late, there is a whole section dealing with patriotism and the war. I remembered a George Washington quote and thought to look it up- I wanted to share what I felt reading it years ago. I found much wisdom (as well as contradiction) attributed to Washington, but came across a quote that I did not remember. “An army of asses led by a lion is better than an army of lions led by an ass.” I think this may accurately reconcile the opposing ideas of support for the troops and disdain for the commander’s cause. I never did find the quote I was looking for- I was asked to register for the site and thought that time may be better spent taking advantage of the free mini bar. As I enjoy Thailand’s brew, I will be thinking of our lions. May they have an ass for dinner soon.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Missing Home: the Good, Bad and Indifferent

Cleveland Muslim Imam Arrested

Fawaz Damra - photo from The RepositoryThis is an interesting story since it’s going on in my neck of the woods. Apparently the authorities caught a terrorist fundraiser living in Cleveland, Ohio who was funneling money back to the Islamic Jihad:

Controversial Imam Fawaz Damra was arrested outside his home early Friday morning and taken to Detroit for the start of his deportation case.

[…] “He actively espoused and sought funding for the killing of Jews and innocent people,” said [Brian] Moskowitz, who is overseeing the deportation case. “This trumps the others because of the national security grounds.”

Damra was convicted last year of lying on his citizenship application more than a decade ago. He spent two months in prison after prosecutors proved he raised money for Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other groups.

But the real jab in the government’s eye is the possibility that they won’t be able to deport the guy — even with all the curtailing of civil liberties that came in the wake of the PATRIOT Act:

After a year of little public activity on the case, several of the lawyers involved acknowledged they were concerned that Damra could escape deportation for two reasons:

He had committed only one crime — lying on his citizenship application — since coming to the United States. Two crimes of that nature are usually required before deportation, if they occurred more than five years after arrival. [ed- funding terrorist organizations isn’t a crime?]

[…] Damra claims he will be tortured if sent to the West Bank, Gaza or Jordan. International law forbids deporting someone if there’s a likelihood they will be tortured.

I mean come on, this the exactly what they claim to need the Act for, yet they seem utterly hamstrung on what to do with him.

Well, I have a suggestion… do the Israelis a favor and drop him off in the West Bank with a discrete tracking device hidden on his clothes. If he heads for an Islamic Jihad safehouse (you know because the satellite photo will likely show some masked guys carrying RPGs and AKs around the compound), pick up the phone and let Sharon know the coordinates.

[photo credit: The Repository]

( -)-(- )Comments Off on Cleveland Muslim Imam Arrested

No Child Left Behind

It appears that Bret Chenkin, a high school English teacher, wishes to do his part to be sure no child is left behind. He is under fire for giving students a vocab quiz that poked fun of the nation’s president. An example question reads, “I wish Bush would be (coherent, eschewed) for once during a speech, but there are theories that his everyday diction charms the below-average mind, hence insuring him Republican votes.” “Coherent” is the right answer.

Kudos to him for incorporating vocabulary, current events and humor in a single quiz.

Update by Stephen VanDyke: The Moderate Voice makes an interesting point, saying “Simply put, we’re supposed to get both sides when we’re learning, especially in high school. We can’t be objective if the knowledge is unequal.”

If public school teachers will bash Republicans and Democrats equally, this would be a moot issue.


Next Stop: Big Brother…

Papers PleaseWho needs the Real ID when you can get all “Big Brother” on someone going to work using public transportation?


One morning in late September 2005, Deb was riding the public bus to work. She was minding her own business, reading a book and planning for work, when a security guard got on this public bus and demanded that every passenger show their ID. Deb, having done nothing wrong, declined. The guard called in federal cops, and she was arrested and charged with federal criminal misdemeanors after refusing to show ID on demand.

On the 9th of December 2005, Deborah Davis will be arraigned in U.S. District Court in a case that will determine whether Deb and the rest of us live in a free society, or in a country where we must show “papers” whenever a cop demands them.

What this introduction doesn’t mention is that a section of the bus route transits the Denver Federal Center, where this incident took place. According to no signage was posted warning commuters that presenting ID would be required even though it appears that Deborah will be charged with “Conformity to Official Signs and Directions.” responds by saying:

Through these charges, it appears that the Feds are claiming that people were on notice that they had to show ID. Nowhere is this evident, unless ‘Public Welcome’ flags are bureaucratese for ‘Papers, please’.

Would you have shown your ID?


Raich Continues to Challenge Federal Medical Marijuana Prohibition on Constitutional Grounds

Angel Raich, of Gonzales v. Raich fame, is taking her case back to court despite the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that growing weed in one’s backyard somehow involves interstate commerce.

This time, she is using a new constitutional angle of attack. From CBS 5:

Angel Raich contends in a brief filed with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that she has a fundamental liberty right to take “the only medication that enables her to avoid intolerable pain and death.”

The brief argues that barring her from using marijuana would violate her “fundamental right to life” under the Fifth Amendment due process guarantee of the Constitution.

Her hubby adds:

Robert Raich, who is Angel Raich’s husband and attorney, said, “This case implicates perhaps the most fundamental right of all, the right to preserve one’s life.”

As always, everyone at HoT admires Angel for her courage, wishes her success in her legal endeavors, and perhaps even more importantly, hopes that she survives the ordeal. Others haven’t always been so lucky.


Recent Stories that Missed the Front Page

This must take the cake as the world’s worst business plan:

Former FEMA Director Michael Brown, heavily criticized for his agency’s slow response to Hurricane Katrina, is starting a disaster preparedness consulting firm to help clients avoid the sort of errors that cost him his job.

Some thoughts on beer, evolution and Intelligent Design:

If you’re such as inclined to do something in close proximity to a whirring propeller, AND you’ve got a good belly full of beer, then congratulations!

…Most people would say, “Why would I somehow enter into a situation where my penis is coming close to a decidedly anti-penis contraption?” But for the boat accident victim, their brain works differently. Their question is, “How can I afford not to do this?” And that’s how the herd is thinned. Sunrise, sunset. Beautiful.

From the “Must Be a Typo Department”:

A recent survey has poured cold water on what everyone believed till now was every man’s dreams…
…if they were paid a 100,000 pounds for it, a whopping 83 percent of them would turn down an offer of sex with their wives and a sexy girl friend, even if the opportunity ever presented itself.

Here is an example of the Justice System (almost) actually working:

“Cold and snow forced an Ohio woman sentenced to spend a night in the woods for dumping 33 kittens back to jail. Michelle Murray, 25, a former animal rescuer, was convicted of animal cruelty last month. Judge Michael Cicconetti sentenced Murray to spend the night in the woods without food or light. He said he wanted her to feel the same pain as the kittens she neglected.”

Libertarians no longer the world’s worst dressed, according this article:

More than 150 tech professionals attended a corporate fashion show in Sydney as organisers officially dubbed the industry “the worst dressed” in Australia.

Short sleeved shirts, man-made fibres and the wrong coloured socks were some of the most common fashion faux-pas cited by corporate stylist, Melanie Moss, who hosted the event on Wednesday night.

Oops of the day! Seems the writer forgot about that pesky little Patriot Act thing.

Title: The FBI Is NOT Watching Your Email

Okay, everyone who has received one of those emails supposedly from the FBI or CIA telling you your IP address has been logged for potential illegal activity, RELAX. It’s just another stupid scam.

Coyote ugly (def.) no longer blamed on beer, and provides one argument to ban smoking:

“The beer goggles effect isn’t solely dependent on how much alcohol a person consumes, there are other influencing factors at play too,” said Professor Nathan Efron, Professor of Clinical Optometry at the University of Manchester. Amazingly, scientists now believe you don’t even need to have had an alcoholic drink to suffer from the beer goggles effect.”


The Great Thanksgiving Hoax – Richard Maybury

No, I’m not trying to rain on anyone’s parade. This is actually an inspiring article on how free market principles allowed the early colonies of this country to thrive after brief and largely unsuccessful attempts with socialism.

To rectify this situation, in 1623 Bradford abolished socialism. He gave each household a parcel of land and told them they could keep what they produced, or trade it away as they saw fit. In other words, he replaced socialism with a free market, and that was the end of famines.

Many early groups of colonists set up socialist states, all with the same terrible results. At Jamestown, established in 1607, out of every shipload of settlers that arrived, less than half would survive their first twelve months in America. Most of the work was being done by only one-fifth of the men, the other four-fifths choosing to be parasites. In the winter of 1609-10, called “The Starving Time,” the population fell from five-hundred to sixty.

Then the Jamestown colony was converted to a free market, and the results were every bit as dramatic as those at Plymouth. In 1614, Colony Secretary Ralph Hamor wrote that after the switch there was “plenty of food, which every man by his own industry may easily and doth procure.” He said that when the socialist system had prevailed, “we reaped not so much corn from the labors of thirty men as three men have done for themselves now.”

I’ll end by saying that Richard Maybury is one of my favorite authors. His ‘Uncle Eric‘ series is a great introduction to the theory of individual liberty. They make great Xmas gifts for younger family members (hint hint).

Happy holidays.

( -)-(- )Comments Off on The Great Thanksgiving Hoax – Richard Maybury


In July, I posted a blog entry over at the Libertarian Party website entitled “Can Purism and Pragmatism Co-exist?” My key intent was to better define the role of the LP and figure out some mechanism for purists and pragmatists to ally against our common enemies. I closed my rant with with:

There is nothing wrong with being an ideologue – I consider myself one. However, in a conflict between ideology and politics – as a political party, the LP must act in a principled but political manner.

There is clearly room for both ideologues and political players within the libertarian movement. However, for movement to actually move, it is imperative that we work together instead of in opposition to one another.

The comments on that posting led to another blog entry, which I posted at LibertyForSale. There are many brands of libertarians, and I was trying to get beyond the traditional labels to better define the conflict many of us have with each other. In an e-mail, Tom Knapp summed the major conflict best by stating the real division is probably between the ideological wing and the political wing of the party. He even used this dividing point in an article a few days later.

I thought I had seen every possible legitimate definition and subset of libertarianism until I ran into this one today (which, in turn, led me to this website). The guy who wrote it is a local, so I intend to contact him personally and get more of his views on the topic.


Libertarians Can Be Christians

I am a libertarian and also a Christian. Many if not most libertarians I speak to are also Christians.

Many Christians do not support gay marriage. I also do not support gay marriage but I realize that marriage licenses were first used in this country to stop whites and blacks from intermarrying. George Washington did not have a marriage license. Was he living in sin? I personally don’t want the government telling me what is acceptable or giving me permission to do something that God has already gave me a right to do.

My parents had a marriage license and when I was about five months old my father left us. That marriage license was nothing but a waste of money. It is also common to hear about how gays will go to hell and I am not doubting that but we very seldom hear people condemn fornication or adultery this aggressively but the Bible tells us that they are both sins.

Another argument is that God will destroy America if gays live together remember Sodom. Yes I do remember Sodom and if we read the whole story it tells us in Genesis 18:33 that it would not have been destroyed if only ten righteous people could be found in the city.

If you have a right from God to do something you don’t need a license. In the day of judgment God will decide who is correct and who is incorrect not the government or the president who are supporters of the United Nations.

Free speech is also something libertarians love and we support you talking about your religious beliefs in public because the public square is a free speech zone and you don’t have to have permission from anyone to say what is on your mind even if it offends someone.

In closing I would like to remind everyone that the first amendment does not create a separation of Church and state but stops congress from passing any laws establishing religion. I am against the federal governments involvement in education where there is a public funding of the religious belief in Evolution.