US Totalitarianism Loses Major Battle As Judge Permanently Blocks NDAA’s Military Detention Provision…
Obama Administration quickly appeals…
High school student questioned by FBI over anti-NDAA assignment, prompted to turn informant…
From a campaign release today:
It is tragic when Americans serving their country are murdered, and we both mourn their loss and honor their service.
Part of honoring that service is to ask the obvious question: What U.S. interest is being served by putting our people – and our money – in places where U.S. personnel can be killed by extremists over a video? We launched millions of dollars worth of missiles to bring down Gaddafi, and this is what we get. We hail and encourage the outbreak of an Arab Spring in Egypt, send them billions of dollars we can’t afford, — and our embassy is breached and our flag desecrated.
In Afghanistan, we continue to put our troops in harm’s way 10 years after our post-9/11 mission was complete. Why?
The airwaves are filled today with political chest-pounding and calls for decisive action. The most decisive and prudent action we can take today is to stop trying to manage governments and peoples on the other side of the globe who don’t want to be managed, get our people out of impossible situations that have no direct U.S. interest, and immediately stop sending money to regimes who clearly cannot or will not control their own countries.
Protecting America with a strong national defense and a rational foreign policy is our leaders’ most basic responsibility. But let us not confuse national security with senseless intervention where our interests are clearly not being served.
Or you know, just let tweedle dee or tweedle dum keep putting people in harm’s way, while also stoking the fires of hatred on both sides.
When “just another day,” isn’t:
Demonstrators attacked a U.S. consulate in Libya, killing one American, and breached the walls of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, amid angry protests over a film by a U.S. producer that mocks and insults the Prophet Muhammad.
Egyptian protesters climbed the walls of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and replaced the flag with a black standard bearing an Islamic inscription, in protest of a film deemed offensive to the Prophet Muhammad. Matt Bradley has details on The News Hub.
The movie, “Innocence of Muslims,” was directed and produced by an Israeli-American real-estate developer who characterized it as a political effort to call attention to the hypocrisies of Islam. It has been promoted by Terry Jones, the Florida pastor whose burning of Qurans previously sparked deadly riots around the world. see more…
An under-rated, dispassionate mathematical analysis of the race back on August 14th:
Running the current statewide polling data through our simulation model, there are currently sixteen states – including Pennsylvania – in which Obama has a greater than 95% probability of winning. These sixteen contribute a total of 205 electoral votes to his total. Governor Romney also has sixteen states in his certain win column, but because of population differences they contribute only 141 electoral votes to his total.
A second level includes those states that while not certain wins for each of the candidates a win is considered likely. This level adds three more states to the Obama tally with an additional 58 electoral votes. Romney gains a single state and only three additional electors.
Including this level the President currently has 263 electoral votes requiring only seven additional electors. Governor Romney has 144 electoral votes and still needs 126 more.
To reach 270 it might be possible for Romney to win all four of the states that are leaning in his favor – Kansas, Kentucky, South Carolina, and South Dakota. This adds thirty-two electors to his total. If he also takes all three of the true tossup states – Colorado, Missouri, and Tennessee – he gains an additional thirty electors. But that only brings him to 203 – still 67 short. To make up these additional votes he will need to take all of the states that are polling close, but still leaning Obama.
At this point the probability of an Obama reelection is at 99.8% – as close to a certainty as one might expect. But it might be possible for Romney to change the result by swaying a few of the battlegrounds. But it will take more than a single win. For example Ohio is currently a likely Obama win. But if between now and November Romney can change that outcome and take Ohio his odds barely improve with Obama’s chance of winning dropping to just under 99%.
Instead, Romney will have to sweep all of the battlegrounds.
Electoral Vote — who uses a different modeling process to come to a similar conclusion — has a daily snapshot that shows the math hasn’t changed any better for Romney from nearly a month ago when the tally stood at Obama 317, Romney 212, and 9 contested. Today shows Obama has steadily strengthened across polling in those battleground states, now electorally dwarfing Romney 347 to 191.
Of course, these polls and predictions are all for laughs and giggles when we ask mathematicians to begrudgingly factor in the very real variable of the much abused October Surprise, not to mention two candidates who have failed to charismatically inspire anywhere near the same levels of enthusiasm as the race of just four years ago, instead using division and fear as their primary campaign weapons.
Joe Biden recently extended an invitation to the media to check the veracity of his claims on Medicare, saying, “I say to the press, ‘Fact check me.’” Biden continued by saying Republican proposals will cause the Medicare trust fund to run out of money by 2016.
CBS reports, “media fact-checkers have in fact investigated similar remarks by Biden about Medicare going bankrupt in 2016 and found them to be inaccurate.”
Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post reported, Medicare “Part A, which pays hospitals, has a ‘trust fund,’ made up of special-issue Treasury bonds, that always seems to be on the edge of running dry. But even so, the payroll tax could pay most estimated expenditures for decades. And does anyone doubt Congress would not step in and fill any gaps?”
Glenn Kessler makes a point that should cause you to pause and think. Congress will no doubt “ step in and fill any gaps” which will only make the problem worse.
In her award winning book, Healing Our World, Dr. Mary Ruwart wrote, “The costs of medical care are skyrocketing because of the heavy regulation of the health care industry, including the licensing of physicians and pharmaceuticals. Should we consider using the aggression of taxation to subsidize national health insurance until deregulation?
…[U]sing the guns of government to solve the problems created by aggression only makes matters worse. …[S]ubsidies encourage waste. In countries with subsidized national health insurance, people demand care for minor ailments they used to treat themselves. As a result, patients wait for critical care.”
It doesn’t matter if Joe Biden is correct about if or when the Medicare Trust Fund will go bankrupt. Medicare, Social Security, and all tax-payer funded programs are nothing more than political footballs being tossed around by the red team and blue team of the Republicratic Duopoly.
It doesn’t matter which major party gets elected, the rhetoric will continue.
I encourage you to think outside of the box, not buy into the rhetoric and stop supporting the two parties who created this problem in the first place.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
contact: Darryl W. Perry 202-709-4377
Keene, NH – On September 1, 2012 the NH Liberty Party held an organizational meeting. During this meeting the bylaws of the party were adopted. Included in the adopted bylaws is a five plank platform that can never be modified.
The NH Liberty Party supports secession for New Hampshire and believe individuals have the same right to declare themselves independent from any government. The NH Liberty Party Platform states the party’s support of individual rights, the principle of non-aggression and voluntary interaction. The Party also support repealing all laws that create “crimes” without a victim and believe “All peaceful prisoners should be released, so long as their ‘crime’ does not have a victim.”
The State Committee for the NH Liberty Party consists of three co-chairs. The co-chairs on the State Committee are Ian Freeman, Conan Salada and Darryl W. Perry.
Ian Freeman is a co-host on the nationally syndicated radio show Free Talk Live and owner of the blog FreeKeene.com. Conan Salada is an artist and a producer and editor of Shire TV. Darryl W. Perry is the Owner and Managing Editor of Free Press Publications and the former Chair of the Boston Tea Party National Committee. All three co-chairs moved to New Hampshire as part of the Free State Project.
Johnson’s campaign has delivered yet another positive ad in a campaign season characterized by negativity and character attacks.
And what’s that? A Libertarian proving it’s actually possible to fix the shit out of the roads and deliver a freedom utopia (the opposite of a centrally planned hellhole) if Americans will just give them a goddamn shot at the job? Finally.
While other corporations were playing favorites, they sponsored both the RNC and DNC:
But, the most disturbing similarity between the two is direct corporate sponsorship, and the more obscure soft corporate funding through their respective host committees. While the GOP Convention website proudly boasts their corporate sponsors on their homepage, the Democrats have also accepted corporate funding while trying to maintain the sheen of grassroots funding. Corporate funders for the GOP include Google, Microsoft, Wellcare, Walmart, Chevron and an assortment of energy companies among others. Democratic sponsors include AT&T, Bank of America, Duke Energy, Time Warner Cable, UnitedHealth Group, Piedmont Natural Gas, and US Airways. Coca Cola and Wells Fargo have covered their bets by sponsoring both conventions.
There will be no grassroots takeover happening anytime soon in either major party — they’ve successfully purged or assimilated them into the establishment. But hey, at least we know who’s pulling the strings on our duopoly puppet show.
Clear-eyed “Numerian” over at The Money Party reminds us we’re on a dangerous historical path:
Show trials and party purges
The Republican Party has not yet been able to use the judiciary as a means of enforcing party dictates (other than through the traditional means of stacking the courts with Republican judges). Even though we haven’t had 1930s style show trials in the US, there has been an ominous development this week that has set the Republicans on the path of purges that weed out undesirables in the party. The usual process of the quadrennial political conventions is for the first ballot to be an open ballot, so that all the candidates who have run in the primaries and who won delegates to the convention will allow their name to be placed in nomination and votes counted from their supporters. Even in the case where a candidate such as Mitt Romney has locked up the nomination, this ritual is observed, if only to preserve party unity in the election (the losing nominees after the first ballot “free up” their delegates and urge them then to vote for the winner of the primaries).
This ritual was not observed this week at the Republican National Convention. Ron Paul received a substantial number of votes in the primaries and had a large number of delegates at the convention. The Romney team pushed some of these delegates off the floor and out of the convention quite unceremoniously, using trumped up reasons (with the seating of the state of Maine’s delegates, for example). Then, when it came time for the first ballot, even though the states went ahead and announced the votes for Ron Paul, the chair would ignore those and announce only the votes for Mitt Romney. Worse was to come. The party introduced rules that will make it much harder in future primaries for someone like Ron Paul to get much if any votes. These were put up for voice vote, and even though the nays obviously shouted louder than the yeas, the chair – in this case House Speaker John Boehner, called the vote for the yeas. In fact, people could see the teleprompter Boehner was using, where it clearly instructed him to say the yeas had won the vote no matter what he heard.
This is a classic party purge, and a number of Ron Paul delegates walked out of the convention in disgust (many of them are using the internet to announce they have left the party altogether). For the first time, and despite the fact Romney is in a very tight race for the presidency, party purity is more important than party unity. Once purges begin they are very difficult to end, and since Romney is something of an empty vessel on matters of principle (his policy program is nothing but the trite Republican bromides of tax cuts for the wealthy, deregulation, and endless defense spending), it is up to the Tea Party faction to fight it out with the Evangelical Christian faction and the Oligarchic funders of the party to see which side will remain standing.
I put “accident” in quotes for Mr. Numerian because totalitarian fascist pricks tend to look a lot like the mafia. Family above all, turf and homeland. These concepts are evident even among democrats who recently claimed “the government is all we belong to“. Presumably, you eventually can’t leave.
“Nice country/business you got there, it would soy-ten-lee be a shame if anything happened to it. Especially because of those barbaric ________________ [insert current xenophobia-based bogeyman].”
But as Ron Paul kept reminding us: freedom is popular. And thankfully we’re seeing an overwhelming, and undeniable, surge of organized libertarian movers and shakers because of it.
Well, we’re officially beyond cynical. Good luck, America!
Yes, it’s very much real.
Favorite facebook retort: “In Soviet Russia, nation reviews YOU!”
In July I wrote about the possibility of QE3 and reported that Ben Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee during the semi-annual monetary policy report the economic recovery was being held back by anxiety over Europe’s debt crisis and the path of U.S. fiscal policy.
It is now being reported that Bernanke and the Fed may take action during its September 12-13 policymaking meeting. MarketWatch reports, “He downplayed the costs of quantitative easing and said the program has worked to ‘provide meaningful support’ to the recovery… Bernanke called current growth ‘tepid’ and said the economy was ‘far from satisfactory’.”
Bernanke concluded his speech in Jackson Hole by stating, “Over the past five years, the Federal Reserve has acted to support economic growth and foster job creation, and it is important to achieve further progress, particularly in the labor market. Taking due account of the uncertainties and limits of its policy tools, the Federal Reserve will provide additional policy accommodation as needed to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.”
Bernanke’s claim that Fed policy is needed to promote a stronger economic recovery and price stability is laughable.
Since the Fed’s creation in 1913 the value of the dollar has decreased by 96% based on the federal government’s official figures.
Even if the official government figures could be believed, they should be enough proof that Fed policy has failed.
However, the Fed and their international counterparts at the World Bank will likely do something in an attempt to fix the problem of growing food prices. Rueters reports, “World food prices jumped 10 percent in July as drought parched crop lands in the United States and Eastern Europe… From June to July, corn and wheat prices rose by 25 percent each, soybean prices by 17 percent, and only rice prices went down, by 4 percent.”
Colin Roche, a spokesman for the development group Oxfam International, said it was not clear whether governments were prepared to take action “before prices spiral out of control and push more people into hunger.”
“This ‘wait and see’ attitude is unacceptable especially when the World Bank report has warned that prices are expected to remain high and volatile,” Roche said.
The statements by Roche & Bernanke should cause you to think. Do you really want more government spending? Do you really want more inflation in the guise of quantitative easing?
I certainly don’t want either and will continue to advocate for more freedom, support honest money and voluntary interaction.
Ron Paul officially put to bed speculation he would be returning to the presidential stage this year as a candidate — or that he’d endorse any of the remaining candidates — on Tuesday’s The Tonight Show with Jay Leno.
“The system is very biased,” Paul responded when asked by Leno whether he’d give it a shot as a third party or independent candidate.
“We talk a lot about democracy, and send our troops overseas, and want to spread democracy. But democracy isn’t all that healthy in this country. Because if you’re in a third party… you don’t get into the debates. The truth is I had tried to do for the last five years, what I have done, in a third party, I probably wouldn’t have gotten… made it to your show.”
Leno acknowledged Ron Paul’s refusal to be given a speaking role at the RNC last week, asking “If you had endorsed Romney, would you have gotten a speaking role?”
“I imagine I would have,” Paul replied, careful not to mention Romney by name.
Leno pressed for information on how negotiations went down with RNC event managers, Paul explained “the tent was too small and we had too many people.” Asked again if a Mitt Romney endorsement was a prerequisite, he confirmed it was, but “it’s not in writing.”
Leno cracked wise back, “kinda like NBC. Yeah okay, I get it.”
Libertarian Party Chair Geoffrey Neale, in an letter to members helping allay rumors that Ron Paul was planning to magically take over the LP ticket:
Many supporters of Ron Paul have asked what it would take to get Ron Paul included on the Libertarian Party Presidential ticket. The scenario envisioned by inquirers is either Ron Paul taking the Presidential slot, with Gary Johnson dropping to the VP slot; or Ron Paul replacing Jim Gray in the VP slot.
Either scenario requires certain things to happen, and many have serious implications for the LP Ticket:
First, we have no indication that Ron Paul is interested in or would be willing to pursue such a path. Without such an indication, this really remains an intellectual exercise.
The second consideration is found in our Bylaws regarding the role of the Libertarian National Committee (LNC) in relation to our Presidential ticket. Article 14 Section 4 states: “The National Committee shall respect the vote of the delegates at Nominating Conventions and provide full support for the Party’s nominee for President and nominee for Vice-President as long as their campaigns are conducted in accordance with the Platform of the Party.” In short, the LNC does not have the authority under our Bylaws to change the ticket unless “for cause”. No matter how strong an argument is made about the benefits of such a change to our vote totals, our delegates have set strict and strong limits upon our authority.
[…] I certainly can sympathize with the supporters of Ron Paul, and their hopes for being able to vote for Ron in November, but I think the feasibility of the LP being able to do so is difficult, and could be very costly to our Presidential Ticket results, due to the loss of ballot access in so many states. Even a large gain of Ron Paul supporters could be offset by the absence of our ticket on a large number of state ballots.
What I can say with certainty is that there will be a Presidential ticket on the ballot that supporters of Ron Paul can choose to vote for, and I urge each and every Ron Paul supporter to support the Libertarian Party ticket in November. [emphasis added]
With Ron Paul officially giving his farewell to the political race on Leno (both middle fingers metaphorically extended towards the bi-assed party system), not all is lost. Gary Johnson’s campaign may yet pick up some high-profile, willing endorsers now left without a candidate if they get out the lead and realize they don’t need Ron Paul to tell them it’s okay.