Comments on: Assault Hammer of Truth?

By: Reality

Reality — Mon, 04 Feb 2013 19:08:00 +0000

More proof that discredits the libtard nations attack on 2nd amendment rights!!
Their
moronic attack has nothing to do with deaths, its their libtard hatred
towards firearms that gets their panties all twisted.

By: antan

antan — Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:20:00 +0000

Cars result in 30,000 deaths per year. Perhaps we should not ban assault weapons yet because we should be banning cars first. Similarly, landmines cause 0 deaths in the USA. Hence, landmines should not be illegal because hammers and cars are legal and cause more deaths. “Ban cars and hammers first, leave my assault rifles and landmines alone!”. If I need to travel, I’ll launch myself using my landmine and channel a human cannon-ball. If I need to bang a nail into my wall, I’ll use the butt of my AR-15, or better still, shoot the damn nail in with 100 bullets per minute.

By: Paul C. Stalter-Pace (FB)

Paul C. Stalter-Pace (FB) — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 00:16:00 +0000

Doesn’t seem like a fair comparison. One class of firearm vs. every kind of hammer… oh and also clubs. I think simply adding handguns would skew it way in the other direction.

By: Roscoe Bonnifitucci

Roscoe Bonnifitucci — Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:21:00 +0000

Time to ban hammers weighing more than 1.5 ounce, or more than 4 inches in length or those made out of any metallic, carbon fiber or semi-metallic material. Only those with special privileges, rights and waivers should be allowed to possess a hammer…and then only with special child lock attachments.