<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court To Decide &#8220;First Sale Doctrine&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hammeroftruth.com/2012/supreme-court-to-decide-first-sale-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hammeroftruth.com/2012/supreme-court-to-decide-first-sale-doctrine/</link>
	<description>common sense, shoved up your...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Wake Up!!!</title>
		<link>http://hammeroftruth.com/2012/supreme-court-to-decide-first-sale-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1061155</link>
		<dc:creator>Wake Up!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hammeroftruth.com/?p=1020835#comment-1061155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re. the case before the Supreme Court, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons


A decision that is contrary to the established doctrine of &#039;First Sale&#039; would have devastating economic impact throughout the economy, as noted below. 


In normal commerce, a manufacturer sells a product in large bulk quantity to a wholesale distributor, who then divides it into smaller bulk quantities and sells it to retailers. The retailers further divide the bulk and then sell the product to consumers. 


If &#039;First Sale&#039; is not upheld, it would destroy the supply chain, requiring consumers to purchase goods directly from manufacturers, which would be extremely costly for both manufacturers and consumers.


As an example, A consumer wanting a $20 memory module for their PC could not buy it from a company in Texas, the consumer would have to get on a plane to Taiwan to purchase the module. 


The media unfortunately have failed  to note this, seeing only the impact on for example yard sales.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. the case before the Supreme Court, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons</p>
<p>A decision that is contrary to the established doctrine of &#8216;First Sale&#8217; would have devastating economic impact throughout the economy, as noted below. </p>
<p>In normal commerce, a manufacturer sells a product in large bulk quantity to a wholesale distributor, who then divides it into smaller bulk quantities and sells it to retailers. The retailers further divide the bulk and then sell the product to consumers. </p>
<p>If &#8216;First Sale&#8217; is not upheld, it would destroy the supply chain, requiring consumers to purchase goods directly from manufacturers, which would be extremely costly for both manufacturers and consumers.</p>
<p>As an example, A consumer wanting a $20 memory module for their PC could not buy it from a company in Texas, the consumer would have to get on a plane to Taiwan to purchase the module. </p>
<p>The media unfortunately have failed  to note this, seeing only the impact on for example yard sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty Jack</title>
		<link>http://hammeroftruth.com/2012/supreme-court-to-decide-first-sale-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-1061153</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hammeroftruth.com/?p=1020835#comment-1061153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s likely they&#039;ll uphold the lower courts&#039; decision against first sale from imported goods, which will only serve to ensure that companies can extract higher profits from consumers in a wealthier nation.


Of course that will only lead to more robust black markets, but we already knew they were going to flourish in a planned economy such as this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s likely they&#8217;ll uphold the lower courts&#8217; decision against first sale from imported goods, which will only serve to ensure that companies can extract higher profits from consumers in a wealthier nation.</p>
<p>Of course that will only lead to more robust black markets, but we already knew they were going to flourish in a planned economy such as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 316/318 objects using disk

 Served from: hammeroftruth.com @ 2013-05-25 19:31:20 by W3 Total Cache -->